President of Tanzania rejects $10 billion Chinese loan and tells China to f[inks] off (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 12:14:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  President of Tanzania rejects $10 billion Chinese loan and tells China to f[inks] off (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: President of Tanzania rejects $10 billion Chinese loan and tells China to f[inks] off  (Read 993 times)
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,357
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« on: April 24, 2020, 12:56:37 AM »

We can cheer it all we want, but unless Europe and the US starts putting forward an ambitious program to support Africa's development, China is sooner or later going to turn it into its protectorate. Geopolitics abhors a vacuum almost as much as nature does.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,357
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2020, 05:06:48 PM »

We can cheer it all we want, but unless Europe and the US starts putting forward an ambitious program to support Africa's development, China is sooner or later going to turn it into its protectorate. Geopolitics abhors a vacuum almost as much as nature does.

Those aren't the only options, e.g. India and Turkey are also trying to boost their influence and presence on the continent, Brazil showed interest in doing so under Lula and may return post-Bolsonaro. Both China and the West are problematic partners for Africa, so hopefully they can choose from a wider range of partners and avoid being dependent on one great power or "bloc".

In theory I'd agree with you, but I don't believe that India or Brazil are anywhere close to achieving the degree of material prosperity necessary to project economic influence overseas. Latin American economies are still too dependent on commodity exports, which means they're rolling in cash when the price are high and utterly helpless when they're low. India still has mass poverty and isn't even close to attaining the kind of long-term growth China has had. It would be fantastic if we had non-Western democracies with economic power, but sadly that just hasn't materialized yet.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,357
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2020, 12:55:23 AM »

In theory I'd agree with you, but I don't believe that India or Brazil are anywhere close to achieving the degree of material prosperity necessary to project economic influence overseas. Latin American economies are still too dependent on commodity exports, which means they're rolling in cash when the price are high and utterly helpless when they're low. India still has mass poverty and isn't even close to attaining the kind of long-term growth China has had. It would be fantastic if we had non-Western democracies with economic power, but sadly that just hasn't materialized yet.
Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan would beg to differ.

Japan has been in a depression for three decades. South Korea and Taiwan are far too small to project economic power.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,357
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2020, 08:47:25 PM »

We can cheer it all we want, but unless Europe and the US starts putting forward an ambitious program to support Africa's development, China is sooner or later going to turn it into its protectorate. Geopolitics abhors a vacuum almost as much as nature does.

Those aren't the only options, e.g. India and Turkey are also trying to boost their influence and presence on the continent, Brazil showed interest in doing so under Lula and may return post-Bolsonaro. Both China and the West are problematic partners for Africa, so hopefully they can choose from a wider range of partners and avoid being dependent on one great power or "bloc".

In theory I'd agree with you, but I don't believe that India or Brazil are anywhere close to achieving the degree of material prosperity necessary to project economic influence overseas. Latin American economies are still too dependent on commodity exports, which means they're rolling in cash when the price are high and utterly helpless when they're low. India still has mass poverty and isn't even close to attaining the kind of long-term growth China has had. It would be fantastic if we had non-Western democracies with economic power, but sadly that just hasn't materialized yet.

You don't necessarily need a high degree of prosperity to project economic power abroad since government's can - and do - ignore large parts of their population. What you need is a big economy and a high technological level. India has both and (unfortunately) they're aren't likely to start using a lot of their resources on a "war on poverty" in their own country. The Modi regime clearly has global ambitions and consider itself a power with global interests (e.g. they're observers in the Arctic Council and have an Arctic program, as is China, SK, Japan and Singapore, basically the Asian countries that think of themselves as "global actors") and Indian businesses have a strong presence in many African countries (Zambia, Kenya etc.), and there is an Indian diaspora, not just the old South African one but also expats from the business community.

It doesn't necessarily have to be democracies African countries work with (Turkey and India aren't exactly model democracies) as long as they have choices so they can work with a number of external partners and avoid becoming sucked into a future "Great Game" between China and the US or relying on their former colonial masters (not necessarily a bad thing, but especially French Africa policy still has strong elements of neocolonialism). I do think that a number of mid-level powers have an interest in Africa and that they won't be left with a binary choice.

Fair points. I don't know enough about India or other mid-level powers' capabilities to really counter that, and I certainly thing they'd be preferable to China as a local hegemon, but I still doubt they'll be able to truly compete when push comes to shove. We'll see, I guess.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,357
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #4 on: May 01, 2020, 02:00:48 AM »

I think now might be a good time for the US to get involved & influence some of these African countries, by pivoting them away from China.

If the US was capable of having anything resembling a coherent, long-term foreign policy right now and wasn't so obscenely stingy about its foreign aid, yes, it certainly would be.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,357
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #5 on: May 01, 2020, 09:58:11 PM »


Ah, yes, measuring the weight of spending items as a percentage of the deficit makes total sense. Very meaningful figure. We've got a big-brained fiscal policy expert right here, folks.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 10 queries.