Oklahoma's domino has fallen (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 04:15:40 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Oklahoma's domino has fallen (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Oklahoma's domino has fallen  (Read 4735 times)
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,299
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« on: July 21, 2014, 04:45:07 PM »

So are we rating other people's happiness now?
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,299
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2014, 05:40:25 AM »

I have no idea at all what point King is trying to make here, but it's disappointing to see.

Indeed. He's always struck me as a cool and generally intelligent poster, so I'm quite surprised to see him being such an immature asshole for absolutely no reason.

Just apologize, dude.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,299
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2014, 05:43:22 AM »

Also, as you know I'm not usually prone to "checkmate, lieberals"-type statements, but what about that whole "being tolerant of different lifestyles and not being too quick to judge them" thing? This seems particularly relevant considering what this thread is originally about.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,299
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #3 on: July 22, 2014, 08:59:31 AM »

Also, as you know I'm not usually prone to "checkmate, lieberals"-type statements, but what about that whole "being tolerant of different lifestyles and not being too quick to judge them" thing? This seems particularly relevant considering what this thread is originally about.

For what it’s worth my original comment on celibacy (which seems to have grown arms and legs since I last checked in) was a rebuttal of the argument (in case it arose from our latest troll) that celibacy should be the route taken by people with non-heterosexual sexualities. Arrangements like that are not psychologically healthy, laced as they often are, with religious connotation and expectation. Personal celibacy is one thing; people drift in and out of periods of sexual activity all the time, but celibacy because ‘it’s what god wants me to do because I am not a married heterosexual’ is another.

I wasn't criticizing you - actually, your post  was excellent and I entirely agree with it. King is the only one who's being a bigoted asshole about this whole thing. I actually fully agree that being in a relationship is, for most people (me included) far preferable to celibacy. That doesn't meant I have to be a dick toward those who feel happier as celibates.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,299
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #4 on: July 22, 2014, 11:21:34 AM »

Nathan's celibacy isn't in any way dictated by religion though.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 12 queries.