Campaign Finance Reform (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 03:25:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Campaign Finance Reform (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Campaign Finance Reform  (Read 815 times)
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,366
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« on: July 17, 2013, 06:11:06 AM »

The solution's pretty simple, really:
- Provide every candidate with the exact same amount of money in public funding. They can't spend any other money (including their own).
- Force major TV networks to provide the same amount of airtime to every candidate, for free. Ban any other political advertising on TV.
- Ban any "independent" activity in campaigning. Any message in support of a candidate/party must be authorized by said candidate/party and is counted in their airtime/money count.

Of course, this will never happen in the US.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,366
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #1 on: July 21, 2013, 05:42:45 AM »

The solution's pretty simple, really:
- Provide every candidate with the exact same amount of money in public funding. They can't spend any other money (including their own).
- Force major TV networks to provide the same amount of airtime to every candidate, for free. Ban any other political advertising on TV.
- Ban any "independent" activity in campaigning. Any message in support of a candidate/party must be authorized by said candidate/party and is counted in their airtime/money count.

Of course, this will never happen in the US.

That's basically what I'm saying, but we can't force what the media does in our country. Also, ads are very expensive so if they agree to run an ad for a candidate, they can't do it without being paid for it. I'd like to ban "independent" ads, but I think the Supreme Court would overturn it. I like how the candidates have to address the ads themselves at the beginning and end of commercials. You'd like to see candidates not be allowed to opt out of public financing? I agree.

This would require a couple constitutional Amendments, indeed.

As for the cost of airing ads, I highly doubt that a couple dozen hours every four years are going to send TV stations into bankruptcy...
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,366
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #2 on: July 21, 2013, 07:27:38 PM »

I know but if a network doesn't want to broadcast an ad, then they shouldn't have to.

Why not? That's a fairly low price to pay for democracy.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,366
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #3 on: July 22, 2013, 04:23:50 AM »

I know but if a network doesn't want to broadcast an ad, then they shouldn't have to.

Why not? That's a fairly low price to pay for democracy.

We can't force anyone to endorse or advertise anything in our country. It's comparable to forcing someone to cut their neighbor's grass without paying them.

TV networks are not people. They are means of communication. Their freedom expression can be properly limited if the people, through its elected representatives, thinks it best to do so.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 11 queries.