1992 Presidential Election by Congressional District (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 05:51:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  1992 Presidential Election by Congressional District (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1992 Presidential Election by Congressional District  (Read 35840 times)
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,506
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« on: December 30, 2010, 06:10:11 AM »
That's very interesting. Keep it going ! Smiley
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,506
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2010, 08:05:40 PM »
Louisiana is really a scary gerrymander.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,506
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2011, 01:13:00 PM »
That's very interesting. Looking at TX and OK, or at IN and PA, seems like electoral geography has changed a lot in 16 years...
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,506
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2011, 04:58:19 AM »
Michigan and Illinois are stunning. So much areas that now look solidly rep that went to Clinton...
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,506
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #4 on: January 16, 2011, 02:11:26 PM »
^^^
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,506
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #5 on: January 18, 2011, 04:24:11 PM »
Wow... Clinton did pretty bad in the Upstate compared to Obama, really surprising. Though it's true that generally speaking NY was far less dem in 1992 than it is today.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,506
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #6 on: January 19, 2011, 04:44:02 AM »
Quote from: Gweithiwr on January 18, 2011, 04:32:33 PM
I'm not sure if I'm seeing a massive difference other than the rural east.

Well, this difference is still noticeable.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,506
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #7 on: January 21, 2011, 09:37:30 AM »
Well, there is another way to put it. In order to account for redistricting, here are the county maps. Wink





Seems like you are right : the maps are mostly unchanged except for the East which saw a massive swing. How to explain that, proximity with Vermont ?
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,506
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #8 on: January 23, 2011, 06:34:37 AM »
Quote from: Landslide Lyndon on January 23, 2011, 02:58:14 AM
What the heck is going on with the 23d? I thought that districts had to be at least contiguous to be considered legal.

Yeah, I feel the same.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 12 queries.