Who is the worst president of United States ? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 09:10:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Who is the worst president of United States ? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which of those do you consider as the worst president of United States ?
#1
John Q. Adams
 
#2
James Buchanan
 
#3
Ulysses Grant
 
#4
Herbert Hoover
 
#5
Richard Nixon
 
#6
Jimmy Carter
 
#7
George Bush
 
#8
Another one ( please specify )
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 69

Author Topic: Who is the worst president of United States ?  (Read 4610 times)
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« on: May 17, 2009, 01:35:51 PM »

George W. Bush hands down. Others on this list had good intentions but were simply ineffective. GWB had no redeeming traits and was only interested in the power of himself and certain others and no compassion for anyone else.

I don't think so. I think Bush really believed in the inanities he said, he really belived that he was saving the world with destroying Iraq and abolishing civil liberties. He was just one of the worst idiots the world ever knew, an idiot who hates intelligence.

Quite an objective analysis.

Lincoln was quite easily the worst. From removing civil liberties, throwing citizens in jail with no trial or charges, using human shields during war time, not prosecuting war crimes, et al. Needless to say J.W. Booth was the best thing to come along during his presidency. Unfortunately he became a player about 2 years to late.

Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2009, 01:38:51 PM »

Lincoln was quite easily the worst. From removing civil liberties, throwing citizens in jail with no trial or charges, using human shields during war time, not prosecuting war crimes, et al.

Sounds like someone else we know, whose only difference from that list is that he was on the side of the south.

Davis? Not hardly.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2009, 01:56:07 PM »

Lincoln was quite easily the worst. From removing civil liberties, throwing citizens in jail with no trial or charges, using human shields during war time, not prosecuting war crimes, et al.
Sounds like someone else we know, whose only difference from that list is that he was on the side of the south.
Davis? Not hardly.

No, Bush.

Bush didn't do any of that, so try again.

Quite an objective analysis.

Lincoln was quite easily the worst. From removing civil liberties, throwing citizens in jail with no trial or charges, using human shields during war time, not prosecuting war crimes, et al. Needless to say J.W. Booth was the best thing to come along during his presidency. Unfortunately he became a player about 2 years to late.



Wow. Eulogy of a political assassination, plus those of the man who abolished slavery. Not exactly what you need to convince me that you are not very, very rightist.

Thanks for Bush anyways.

War is hell, when you needlessly rape women and use human shields the end can't be to happy. Just like Hitler and Mussolini got the justice they deserved.

And the idea that Lincoln abolished slavery is one of the biggest myths of the War for Southern Independence.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« Reply #3 on: May 17, 2009, 02:04:54 PM »

The emancipation proclamation was a political move. I'd strongly suggest you go read about the proclamation before assuming it actually had any power.

http://www.nps.gov/anti/historyculture/freedom.htm
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« Reply #4 on: May 19, 2009, 11:02:41 PM »


How would you have settled the Indian issue? Would you have allowed your citizens to be at constant war with roving tribes killing families on the frontier? Some of the things that occurred were unfortunate but the necessity of the removal was there.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« Reply #5 on: May 20, 2009, 12:24:01 AM »

My point is the continual sniping on the frontier was untenable and had to be dealt with. Separating the two groups was the best choice during that time period.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« Reply #6 on: May 20, 2009, 03:14:12 PM »

My point is the continual sniping on the frontier was untenable and had to be dealt with. Separating the two groups was the best choice during that time period.

So you consider that two ethnies are unable to pacifically coexist in the same space ? Sorry, but I have to notice that's not so far from Hitler's vision.

Reading comprehension failure coupled with Godwins law. Cute.

Do you have any understanding regarding the history of the settlement of the United States? Do you think/believe the Natives and European settlers were for the most part peaceably cohabiting? Did I say I personally support separation of different ethnic groups? When you are discussing history you have to understand the thought and motivation of the time period. I know you don't have a strong grasp of the English language because you're a foreigner, I understand that. But please, get over yourself and your stupid accusations. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 13 queries.