A question for both sides of the spectrum on the "gay debate"

[??????????]

It's not a choice, that's obvious.  And if if it was, how is it immoral to act on it? 

Personally, my theory on homosexuality is simple.  We all have both male and female hormones in our bodies on some level.  I think gays might just have too much of the hormone from the opposite sex.  That's not something that can be cured, it's just like having a birthmark, or being naturally intellectual, it's just who you are.  No one should ever have to feel guilty for being gay.  Unfortunately, we have the Church to do that to people, like they're pissing off God by being gay, and letting everybody down.  It's all absurd. 

If its hormones they can easily be regulated and lowered or raised. Hormone therapy is rather common actually.

[??????????]

It's definitely a trait they're born with. No on chooses to be gay. Pretty ridiculous argument in my opinion.

I didn't choose to be straight, I was born that way.

I am willing to concede that the vast majority don't 'choose' to be gay. But certainly they are gay for a reason and it's likely to be some sort of genetic defect, chemical disorder, hormone imbalance or a mixture of all of the above and in some cases, child molestation.

[??????????]

Opebo, it was considered bizarre by most of the world. If a few hundred people from Nebraska decided to brainwash and sleep with little children, would that make it right because it was their statute?

To him anything else would be oppression by the religious.