Life-and-death issues

[??????????]

"Yes" or "No" to each of the following practices staying legal / being legalized, etc.:

Euthanasia: No
Human cloning: No
Death penalty for juveniles: Yes
Death penalty for retarded: No
Death penalty for others: Yes
Partial-birth abortion: No
Parental consent for abortion: Yes
Parental notification for abortion: Yes
Abortion for rape and incest: No
Embryo abortion: No
Fetus abortion: No
Infanticide: No
"Morning after" pill: No
Withdraw troops from Afghanistan: No
Withdraw troops from Iraq: No
Lynching: No
House bombing: No

[??????????]

I cant believe anyone would approve of Euthanasia. Hitler allowed Euthanasia in Germany early on because of a case of a mentally disabled child. It inspired him for his more evil deeds later on.

[??????????]

If someone is terminally ill, in excruciating pain, and wants to be euthanized.  Who am I to tell them no?

Hitler would have agreed with you on that.

[??????????]

No, Germans did not start the move to slaughter civilians in WW2. It was actually the British, who bombed civilian targets in Berlin in response to purely military actions by the Germans over British territory (note that Britain declared war on Germany, so actually the British were by far the most immoral actor). Hitler was naturally infuriated and responded with anti-civilian measures of his own; taking the high ground would have been wiser, if only because it would have made it more likely the Luftwaffe would prevail.

Any British civilians that died in WW2 have Churchill to thank, not Hiter.

You really have a distorted view of things.  Your defense of German atrocities is sickening.  Please don't call yourself a Republican; you are an embarrassment to the party.

Actually he is correct. The British DID begin bombing German civilians as retaliation for an accident that occured during a German bombing raid in London. I know what AuH20 is saying and I think you are misunderstanding him. He is referring to German vs British Civilians. Not Jews, Poles, etc. He is correct in his statements that the British were the first to initiate bombing civilian houses over Berlin and the rest of Germany during WW2.

[??????????]

No, Germans did not start the move to slaughter civilians in WW2. It was actually the British, who bombed civilian targets in Berlin in response to purely military actions by the Germans over British territory (note that Britain declared war on Germany, so actually the British were by far the most immoral actor). Hitler was naturally infuriated and responded with anti-civilian measures of his own; taking the high ground would have been wiser, if only because it would have made it more likely the Luftwaffe would prevail.

Any British civilians that died in WW2 have Churchill to thank, not Hiter.

How exactly did Auschwitz help the Germans defend themselves from the British?

He's not even talking about the holocaust. Talking history on this board is so lame. If you even try to explain how things really happened you are either an a)Holocaust denier or b)Pro-slavery clansman.