New electoral vote calculator (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 05:00:25 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  New electoral vote calculator (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: New electoral vote calculator  (Read 44334 times)
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,854
United States


« on: November 27, 2020, 09:37:41 AM »

A quibble: I would like to see more gradation between 40 and 60. Anyone who wins a state with 55% of the vote is winning by at least 10%, which is a big distinction from winning 51-48 as a characterization of the results. 57-43 is a landslide in any state.

This color scheme is more attractive than what we have had without losing anything obvious. , 
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,854
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2020, 09:22:09 PM »
« Edited: November 27, 2020, 10:03:26 PM by pbrower2a »

An attempt to show colors and shades:



Note that any color of "5" or higher gives black at any level of saturation. Nothing brings about white, which I find interesting on overlaps between elections, as in my favorite (Eisenhower against Obama, which seems to suggest that Ike and Obama ended up with similar constituencies)

Colors are done to show the effects of shades.

For my purposes I would make these suggestions:

1. The 'interesting zone' for contests is really between "48" (in three way races) to "55" A distinction between winning 50 and 49 is obvious, but I would figure that any distinction between "50", "51", "52", "53", "54",  and "55"  is significant. A majority (50) always wins, but although "51" could still be razor-thin, "52" indicates at least a 4% difference, which is near the margin of error, "53" indicates at least a 6% difference, which is outside the margin of error, "54" indicates at least an 8% difference about twice the margin of error, and "55" indicates beyond any doubt an election that is not really close. "60" and higher indicate blowouts, and I would find it easier to put "56" and "62" in the same category than "51" and "55". Anything closer to 60 than to 50 is not close.

I would like options for gradations between 50 and 55 such as 50, 52, 54, and 55.

Of course, I always display a legend when I make any deviation from Leip's norm for any reason.

2. I miss yellow, but not orange. "Dark orange" colors were ugly in the old scheme and I did everything possible to avoid using them. "Dark yellow" came off as  tan. Purple is nice to have.

"3" is green and "4" is purple.

3. A grayscale pattern would be of use, as in an election-day scenario.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,854
United States


« Reply #2 on: November 28, 2020, 07:57:36 PM »
« Edited: July 02, 2021, 09:02:44 AM by pbrower2a »

Let's see if I can show a flip:




Green represents flips from Trump in 2016 to Biden in 2020.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,854
United States


« Reply #3 on: November 28, 2020, 08:34:21 PM »
« Edited: July 02, 2021, 09:06:45 AM by pbrower2a »

How about a map that allows an overlay of two or more elections?



Eisenhower and Obama twice  -- black
Eisenhower twice, Obama 2008, Romney -- pink
Eisenhower twice, McCain, Romney -- deep blue
Eisenhower once, McCain, Romney -- light green
Stevenson twice, McCain, Romney -- dark green
Stevenson twice, Obama 2008, Romney -- pale blue
not voting in the 1950's, Eisenhower twice -- lavender
not voting in the 1950's, Obama twice -- purple

... Electoral votes are for 2012.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.