Let’s be honest here, a large number of the “anti-authoritarian” posters who are against these lockdown measures seem more concerned about inconveniences to their own lives as opposed to actual authoritarianism. That isn’t everyone, but some posters definitely seem to be more concerned about themselves than, well, authoritarianism.
We seem to be accepting some short-term social regimentation across the political spectrum because our squabbles about the relationship between management and labor, between pro-choice and anti-abortion, between cultural divides, and between faith and reason can look trivial. We have seen reports out of China and Iran showing how badly governments can muck things up if authoritarian, secretive, and corrupt. People well-connected in China and Iran have gotten CORVID-19 and died. So did a retired judge in Italy who was a genuine hero in the struggle against the Sicilian Mafia.
So when will some prominent figure of mass culture, politics, academia, or politics die? People started to take AIDS seriously when such people as Arthur Ashe, Liberace, and Rock Hudson died of it and a reinforcement when Robert Reed and Freddie Mercury got it and died.
To be sure, CORVID-19 is very different from HIV?AIDS... its lethality is not completely established, and long-term consequences are unknown; obviously it has different means of spreading. We may be taking means better at stopping bacterial infections than at stopping viral infections -- but bacterial infections make people more vulnerable to viral infections.
Democracies have taken authoritarian measures to meet dangers that can destroy the system. If one did not know that there was a war going on against you-know-who, you might have thought Britain a totalitarian state during World War II. The economy was regimented to almost the same extent as the Soviet Union, and much normal behavior was proscribed. But that is a mere inconvenience in contrast to having the Wehrmacht, Gestapo, and SS in one's country. One knew that when the war was over, that life would be back to normal.
If we go too far with CORVID-19, then what do we lose? There will be economic losses, to be sure. The inconveniences are obvious enough. If you have a strong social in social media, then maybe life will not be as lonely as it might be. However people may have derided Facebook... we may need it.
So... after it is all over, we will get to go out to eat again; we will be able to have more face-to-face conversations with people, and we will all experience pent-up demand. But anyone who gets a fatal case of CORVID-19 wi9ll not get to do such things.