PPP-WI: Hillary leads all Pubs (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 07:02:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  PPP-WI: Hillary leads all Pubs (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PPP-WI: Hillary leads all Pubs  (Read 3584 times)
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,910
United States


« on: March 11, 2015, 01:32:55 AM »

Walker could win Wisconsin -- but only if he got an economic miracle. Such would be an inflow of well-paying, non-union jobs. Democrats now see him as a sell-out to out-of-state interests.

If he can't win Wisconsin with a strong and positive Favorite Son effect, then he is not going to win any of the 52 electoral votes of Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, or Minnesota. He's having trouble in Ohio... and no Republican nominee has ever won without Ohio.

The Democratic Firewall is safe with Walker as the Republican nominee.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,910
United States


« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2015, 04:11:51 PM »

This is a problem. I don't see how Walker can win without Wisconsin.

Perhaps Bush is a better candidate after all. He can win Florida and strongly contest Virginia.


Every Republican candidate has some serious weakness. Not one has shown an ability to breach the Blue (Atlas red) firewall.  Making one or two of the swing states of 2008 or 2012 shaky just won't be enough.

I can almost predict the ad campaign against Jeb: "Like brother, like brother". Republicans may have no problem with another President like George W. Bush... but just about everyone else will. Jeb might be better than his brother, but that is a very low bar.

The luster is off Christie.

Paul Ryan  has never won a statewide race, including winning Wisconsin for Romney/Ryan in 2012. If he has no experience running a statewide race, what says that he could run a national race competently?

Rand Paul gets much support because his father was a dyed-in-the-wool libertarian... but the younger Paul is much more authoritarian on non-economic issues. That will turn off anyone who could possibly vote Democratic for the President.

Huckabee is best described as a regional candidate. He wins the southeastern sector of the US (except for Florida and Virginia) and states that never, ever, ever vote Democratic for President. That's far from good enough.

Santorum, Perry, and Rubio are just too dumb to be President.

 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 11 queries.