pbrower2a
Atlas Star
![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif)
Posts: 26,930
![](./avatars/Democratic/D_MI.gif)
|
![](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/post/xx.gif) |
« on: February 27, 2014, 03:41:56 PM » |
|
One part of the ruling is that consent by one resident is enough -- which should be adequate for domestic violence. Children are likely inadequate unless they are victims or unwilling participants, especially if they are tricked into some 'patriotic duty'.
Spouses have a right to protect themselves by exposing criminal misdeeds of people who might do evil to them. Say nothing about drugs, proceeds of theft, child pornography, or a kidnap victim lest one be beaten? Let's make the choice easier.
If one is a crook one has no right to assume the silence of a spouse, cohabitator, child, or parental charge.
|