Who are the best and wrong VP choice for Clinton and Christie? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 08:52:49 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Who are the best and wrong VP choice for Clinton and Christie? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Who are the best and wrong VP choice for Clinton and Christie?  (Read 3070 times)
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,922
United States


« on: November 01, 2013, 01:22:49 PM »

Christie's best choice would be Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA).  He comes from a key swing state, he has experience sufficient for the job, and he's Jewish.  The GOP has missed some opportunities to make inroads in the pro-Democratic Jewish vote in a number of states.

William Miller, Geraldine Ferraro, Jack Kemp, and Pat Ryan all demonstrate the wisdom of never nominating for VP someone who has never won a statewide election. (Technically because the House seat of Wyoming is at-large, Dick Cheney did win a statewide election, even if it was 'only' Wyoming. But Dick Cheney was not chosen for his ability to swing a key state). Except for Cheney, none of those swung 'their own' states. Those were not bad politicians.  Does anyone suggest that Eric Cantor would be any different?

Florida, Ohio, and Virginia might be close enough that the Jewish vote could  swing those states. Even at that

(1) Joe Lieberman did not keep Florida in the Democratic fold in 2000, and his purpose was to energize the Jewish vote,

(2) the Democrats have plenty of potential Jewish nominees for Vice President (several US Senators) to offset that,

(3) Hillary Clinton isn't going to lose the Jewish vote unless she insults Jews or Israel,

(4) the Republicans still have a difficult time appealing to any non-white, non-Anglo, or non-Christian group.  

Does anyone think that Tim Scott would win over the black vote?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I can't say what would be the best.   

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

They would also show Democrats and many independents why they are not hard-core Republicans. But unlike Sarah Palin they will be well known by 2016 -- if they aren't already. They would cause Christie to fail and set themselves up for 2020.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

The question may be whether Rick Scott will be Governor of Florida in 2016. He, and he alone, can give verbal orders to rig a statewide election. He is corrupt and despotic enough that such would be his choice if the election were close.

I would not have wanted the 2012 election to all depend on Florida.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

It's hard to assess someone on that basis. Joe Manchin would be a worse fit.  
 
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Any Clinton-but-not-Obama state is iffy at best. We need to see how Congressional elections go in those states in 2014 to see whether any such state is reasonably in play.   


 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 11 queries.