^ In all seriousness this isn't a bad answer. Fixing how people get their information would be the biggest start.
Cough *MSNBC* Cough Cough 
MSNBC brings facts to the table. Fox pulls things out of their ass.
No, they really don't... MSNBC is attempting to be Fox for liberals, and in the process has become even
ore hackish than them. See a new Pew Research report.
Hackishness doesn't equal misinformation and outright lying. Those are what FOX is good at.
I would think that their bias has reached a point where it could be categorized as misinformation.
Both FoX News and MSNBC are heavy on analysis, and both have undeniable bias. But at that FoX News is in a league of its own for propaganda in America. Maybe Soviet-era Pravda is a good comparison for FoX News. It is so d@mn manipulative.
MSNBC almost never gets its facts wrong. Unlike FoX it fact-checks. If it catches FoX News in error more often than does it catch itself on the air it is because it stops falsehoods from going on its cable feed, and FoX is more concerned with whether something pleases its audience than that it is right.
Rachel Maddow, Lawrence O'Donnell, and Ed Schultz don't pretend to be without bias. But they aren't political stooges of a political party. They have criticized Democrats for not going far enough.
