FOX News Poll: Obama leads by 5 nationwide (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 06:56:44 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  FOX News Poll: Obama leads by 5 nationwide (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: FOX News Poll: Obama leads by 5 nationwide  (Read 2260 times)
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,895
United States


« on: June 28, 2012, 08:07:06 PM »

Romney leads 49-44 with voters "extremely interested" in the race. These sorts of "interested" respondents are what eventually become the building blocks to LV models.

 They can only vote once.

Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,895
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2012, 01:41:50 PM »

Bad economy, more money raised these past few months, and incumbent in the mid 40s in terms of approval ratings and you still trail by five in GOP-leaning poll.

Mitt Romney flat-out sucks as a candidate.

No, really? OF COURSE!!!!!!! We needed someone like Palin or Bachmann who would have been able to appeal to a vast swath of the electorate. We didn't need Osama-lite.

No, Christine O'Donnell would have been best.  Plus she would have the Wiccan vote all locked up.

The Republicans really needed a RINO to defeat President Obama -- someone able to avoid offending the secularist voters of Northern states. The Mitt Romney of the 1990s would have fit the bill. Instead he approached the lunatic fringe and can't win the center.  But the GOP has effectively purged the moderates. 

Barack Obama won by 7% in 2008, and this 5% gap appears before the unions begin their GOTV drives and the Obama campaign apparatus comes out of mothballs.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,895
United States


« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2012, 03:58:03 PM »

Bad economy, more money raised these past few months, and incumbent in the mid 40s in terms of approval ratings and you still trail by five in GOP-leaning poll.

Mitt Romney flat-out sucks as a candidate.

No, really? OF COURSE!!!!!!! We needed someone like Palin or Bachmann who would have been able to appeal to a vast swath of the electorate. We didn't need Osama-lite.

No, Christine O'Donnell would have been best.  Plus she would have the Wiccan vote all locked up.

The Republicans really needed a RINO to defeat President Obama -- someone able to avoid offending the secularist voters of Northern states. The Mitt Romney of the 1990s would have fit the bill. Instead he approached the lunatic fringe and can't win the center.  But the GOP has effectively purged the moderates. 

Barack Obama won by 7% in 2008, and this 5% gap appears before the unions begin their GOTV drives and the Obama campaign apparatus comes out of mothballs.

So the base would come out right?

In large-enough numbers.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,895
United States


« Reply #3 on: July 06, 2012, 03:29:52 PM »

Wait why isn't the apparatus out of mothballs already?

September. People get more excited riled up about politics as the election gets closer.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.