Santorum 2012 = McGovern 1984? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 01:06:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Santorum 2012 = McGovern 1984? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Santorum 2012 = McGovern 1984?  (Read 2338 times)
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,868
United States


« on: February 02, 2011, 03:04:21 PM »

I see a few parallels. Santorum is far too conservative to win the nomination as McGovern was far too liberal to win the nomination. Both came from states where they didn't exactly fit in. McGovern tried to make a political comeback in 1984, after he lost re-election by 17-18 points (against a weak opponent at that). Santorum is running after he lost re-election by a similar margin.

Good one.

Of course George McGovern is a much more decent fellow and was a more astute politician (probably at serving the farm interests in South Dakota) than was Santorum. Of course, Pennsylvania has little in common with South Dakota, as states go.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,868
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2011, 11:44:52 AM »

Mitt Romney has the private sector experience I believe is needed in the White House right now. At the end of the day, despite past mistakes and misguided opinions, Mitt Romney has the leadership abilities, charisma, and experience needed to strongly lead the GOP in November and defeat Barack Obama.

Truman was a failure in the private sector and an above-average President. Hoover and Dubya had much experience in the private sector, and both were toward the bottom. Reagan had much experience in the private sector, but it wasn't as a businessman.  Government can at best facilitate the private sector. Plenty of American politicians have 'adequate' conviction that pure plutocracy (which America's tycoons, executives, financiers, and big landowners want) is the right way to do things.

Government is not an effective profit-and-loss operation, and if anyone thinks otherwise, then just remember how well the old Soviet Union and its imitators fared. I doubt that any conservative wants the federal government to act more like a business by raising taxes.
 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 11 queries.