Who is most likely to beat Obama? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 08:39:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Who is most likely to beat Obama? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Who is most likely to beat Obama?  (Read 5280 times)
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,860
United States


« on: August 27, 2010, 07:54:15 AM »

Himself.

At this point re-election is his to lose.

If you want a sports analogy, it is the fourth quarter of a football game and as the quarterback of a team up by two touchdowns  and a field goal and the ball on the opponents' 30-yard line as the two-minute warning approaches he must avoid throwing an interception or handing the ball to a runner who has a tendency to fumble.

We know what the interceptions are and what the fumbles are -- scandals, international debacles, a severe economic downturn, and extreme gaffes in a political campaign.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,860
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 03, 2010, 03:48:15 AM »

Himself.

At this point re-election is his to lose.

If you want a sports analogy, it is the fourth quarter of a football game and as the quarterback of a team up by two touchdowns  and a field goal and the ball on the opponents' 30-yard line as the two-minute warning approaches he must avoid throwing an interception or handing the ball to a runner who has a tendency to fumble.

In that situation, the QB will take a knee to run out the clock! Don't you know anything about football?! Tongue

Of course I know the usual strategy -- you try to use the clock so that the other side has no chance at getting 17 points. But there might be people on this Forum who know nothing about American football. I could talk about the nickel defense that allows the other team to score a touchdown, but in a time that the team behind can't get away with. 

In essence, the election of 2012 is for President Obama to lose, and not for someone else to win. Vanity and folly can appear in unlikely places, and we all know what can defeat President Obama.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,860
United States


« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2010, 02:41:39 PM »

Your just highlighted the Republicans' biggest problem with 2012--all their A-list candidates are relatively new to the job.  McDonnell or Christie would each be excellent Presidential candidates if we could fastforward 4 years to where they would have more than a year in office before running again.


Both are likely candidates for 2016 and could win should the Democratic nominee be weak. One thing is sure: that candidate will not be President Obama. In the meantime, the GOP must undo its extreme image. Should the GOP win one or both Houses of Congress in 2010 and act as they do in winning (they will in no way moderate before January) they will have even more damage to undo.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.