WI-LOLras College: Johnson +5 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 07:00:45 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  WI-LOLras College: Johnson +5 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: WI-LOLras College: Johnson +5  (Read 3023 times)
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,173
Greece


« on: October 10, 2016, 04:15:25 PM »

meh, CBS had Feingold + 3, makes since that the race is quickly tightening.

Um, national Republicans and Super PACs withdrew from the race just a week ago. Not exactly the signs of a competitive race.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,173
Greece


« Reply #1 on: October 11, 2016, 04:51:24 AM »

There is nothing majorly wrong with sample, you should have little bit more of black voters.

Why is Clinton winning by so much while Feingold is losing? Maybe the Superpac ads are finally taking their toll & are dragging Russ down!

DNC needs to put considerable resources behind Russ, don't get over-confident - You should Bernie campaign there 3-4 times & Hillary, Obama & Biden should come once each to give a sign of unity!

If Dems loses WI, they are serious idiots!

Do you even read what other people say before posting? There are no Super PACs running ads against Feingold, they bailed on Johnson long ago.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,173
Greece


« Reply #2 on: October 11, 2016, 03:40:04 PM »

Internal polling has been showing the race getting closer and trending to johnson according to pundits.

Proof?

Laura Ingraham's second cousin told him so in a chain e-mail.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 14 queries.