If Bernie had gone negative (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 10:13:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  If Bernie had gone negative (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: If Bernie had gone negative  (Read 828 times)
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,106
Greece


« on: June 05, 2016, 05:05:27 AM »

Embracing right-wing attacks and conspiracy theories like Benghazi and e-mails wouldn't have exactly endeared him among Democratic voters. Especially since he is already accused of not being a real Democrat.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,106
Greece


« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2016, 11:33:00 AM »

If Sanders had gone after over the emails back in the fall, then he might have moved the needle and could very well be the nominee.
Still, I think the only person who could have beaten Hillary this year was Warren.

Yes, peddling Republican talking points/witch hunts would surely play well in a Democratic primary.
Again, the emails are not a right-wing smear. It's very different from Benghazi.

Yes they are. If they weren't then they would have investigated Powell and Rice too.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,106
Greece


« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2016, 11:38:10 AM »

If Sanders had gone after over the emails back in the fall, then he might have moved the needle and could very well be the nominee.
Still, I think the only person who could have beaten Hillary this year was Warren.

Yes, peddling Republican talking points/witch hunts would surely play well in a Democratic primary.
Again, the emails are not a right-wing smear. It's very different from Benghazi.

Yes they are. If they weren't then they would have investigated Powell and Rice too.

They likely should. But there's a big difference: Neither of these two is running for POTUS.

So if you commit an offense but afterwards you retire from public life you get a pardon?
That's a new one.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,106
Greece


« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2016, 11:41:44 AM »

If Sanders had gone after over the emails back in the fall, then he might have moved the needle and could very well be the nominee.
Still, I think the only person who could have beaten Hillary this year was Warren.

Yes, peddling Republican talking points/witch hunts would surely play well in a Democratic primary.
Again, the emails are not a right-wing smear. It's very different from Benghazi.

Yes they are. If they weren't then they would have investigated Powell and Rice too.

They likely should. But there's a big difference: Neither of these two is running for POTUS.

So if you commit an offense but afterwards you retire from public life you get a pardon?
That's a new one.

No, it shouldn't be that way. But you shouldn't be surpised that the public is more interested in Hillary than in Rice and Powell.

The public wouldn't give a flying fyck if the Republicans didn't try to make it the biggest scandal ever in the history of the republic.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.