Why was the '88 Dem field so weak? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 04:07:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why was the '88 Dem field so weak? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why was the '88 Dem field so weak?  (Read 3418 times)
LastMcGovernite
Ringorules
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 828
United States


« on: July 26, 2009, 10:37:56 PM »

I'm not sure I agree that the field was weak in the first place.  You had a congressman, Gephardt, with strong ties to labor and the Midwest.  You had Dukakis, a governor of a state that was then undergoing an improbable economic boom.  You had Joe Biden, who could articulate a positive vision of liberalism better than anyone else in the field.  You had a promising young southernor, Al Gore.  And, as you mention, you had Gary Hart, who had a real shot at appealing to yuppies and westerners. 

Granted, some of these names- especially Gore and Biden- seem more prominent in hindsight, given their ascendency to the vice-presidency.  But it was still a strong field.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.