Incumbents often do better than final polls (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 05:45:12 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Incumbents often do better than final polls (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Incumbents often do better than final polls  (Read 927 times)
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
« on: October 27, 2012, 01:23:02 PM »

Bill Clinton did worse than expected in 1996, right?
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2012, 07:40:54 PM »

The most obvious and memorable UK example is 1992. Most final polls had Labour ahead, but the Tories ended up winning the popular vote by over 7%. Although, actually, the exit poll hinted at a stronger-than-expected Tory performance - it projected them as (just) the largest party in seats.

Even in 1997, a lot of campaign polls showed Labour above 50% and the exit poll over-egged the nevertheless massive pudding.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.