Flint water crisis charges dismissed against ex-Gov. Snyder

[Schiff for Senate]

Snyder was a NeverTrump Republican  who endorsed Biden in 2020.  Just in case you were wondering about the DOJ sleeping through this.

🙄

Snyder is also a conservative- particularly economically conservative - Republican. He’s from YOUR party, whether or not he endorsed Biden. We don’t claim him. LOL at your insinuation that Biden’s DOJ is political. Did you see the stuff the DOJ did under Trump? Bill Barr (but then, he’s also a RINO, I’m sure, because he couldn’t, despite his best efforts, find evidence of fraud where there was none) staunchly defended Trump’s every action and criticised legitimate and warranted investigations into him, and he sent federal law enforcement officers to violently suppress peaceful protestors, called BLM protestors Bolshevik’s, asserted fraud in 2020, and launched a which-hunt investigation into the 2020 results. BILL BARR politicised the DOJ for Donald Trump. So you’re not fooling anyone when you project and act like Merrick Garland (who, btw, would be on the Supreme Court right now if the brazenly partisan Mitch McConnell didn’t blatantly block his confirmation for no good reason) and his DOJ are the hacks here.

[Schiff for Senate]

Snyder was a NeverTrump Republican  who endorsed Biden in 2020.  Just in case you were wondering about the DOJ sleeping through this.

You're going to have to provide some evidence for a claim like that.

I think that the inaction speaks for itself.   

Again, the projection here is just way too much. I can name several dozen brazenly political actions Barr and his DOJ took to politicise the Department of Justice - his Wikipedia page, I think, says it all. Just because your side made the DOJ more hackish and partisan than it had been in a long, long time, doesn’t mean that our side is as hackish or as bad. You refuse to acknowledge all that Trump’s DOJ did to politicise that department, but you’re willing to spout absolutely baseless conspiracy theories that Biden’s DOJ is the one that’s political. Get over yourself. Present evidence that Biden/Garland’s DOJ is political. And stop closing your eyes to or denying the mountains of evidence that it was Trump/Barr’s DOJ that was brazenly political every single step of the way (now granted that Barr couldn’t procure/falsify evidence that wasn’t there, so I guess he’s just a “RINO” now, but before that he was the biggest political hack to serve as AG in a long time - and pretty much every single action he took and decision he made proves it, unlike with Garland, where you’re doing your best to make a mountain ⛰ out of a few scraps of molehill).

[Schiff for Senate]

Snyder was a NeverTrump Republican  who endorsed Biden in 2020.  Just in case you were wondering about the DOJ sleeping through this.

You're going to have to provide some evidence for a claim like that.

I think that the inaction speaks for itself.  

Again, the projection here is just way too much. I can name several dozen brazenly political actions Barr and his DOJ took to politicise the Department of Justice - his Wikipedia page, I think, says it all. Just because your side made the DOJ more hackish and partisan than it had been in a long, long time, doesn’t mean that our side is as hackish or as bad. You refuse to acknowledge all that Trump’s DOJ did to politicise that department, but you’re willing to spout absolutely baseless conspiracy theories that Biden’s DOJ is the one that’s political. Get over yourself. Present evidence that Biden/Garland’s DOJ is political. And stop closing your eyes to or denying the mountains of evidence that it was Trump/Barr’s DOJ that was brazenly political every single step of the way (now granted that Barr couldn’t procure/falsify evidence that wasn’t there, so I guess he’s just a “RINO” now, but before that he was the biggest political hack to serve as AG in a long time - and pretty much every single action he took and decision he made proves it, unlike with Garland, where you’re doing your best to make a mountain ⛰ out of a few scraps of molehill).

Two (2) posts in a row of whataboutisms,  to the point of spamming the thread, and no outrage from red avatars or ProudModerate2.   Just sayin'.

What “whataboutism?” You’re baselessly asserting political hackery by the Garland DOJ, as usual without offering a shred of evidence, just your own random and proof-lacking musings. I’m just pointing out where the real partisan hackery came from (and I notice you’ve not bothered to address that).

Besides, even if my posts ARE somehow moderation-worthy “whataboutism,” the mods aren’t available 24/7 and just because you replied to my post within 3 minutes doesn’t mean they saw it that quickly. At the very least give it a day or so before you return to victimising yourself and crying “Bias! Bias!” on the part of the mods. More than my statement of facts, IMO, you baselessly spouting new conspiracy theories should be worthy of moderation, but if the mods don’t delete your post within 5 minutes (or even if they don’t remove it at all), you won’t here me whining and complaining about it.


Btw, how goes your search to find the evidence that isn’t there regarding Trump’s 2020 win? I know you operate at a higher level in trotting out multiple different lies at the same time.

Now unlike you, I can always offer actual evidence to back up my assertions, in this case that Bill Barr's Department of Justice was intensely political and much more closely tied to the presidency than past DOJs. All you have to do is ask for evidence, and I'll be happy to supply in one big wall of text.

[Schiff for Senate]

Snyder should be in a cell and it's a disgrace that he isn't and that he hasn't been for years now.

Flint and Jackson are signs of how broken America's government is when it comes to solving problems. Seems like if there's no profit or celebrity in stopping it, our politicians are happy to let communities be poisoned in a dozen ways. It's savage and would inevitably be abused, but it sure seems like we'd have less dereliction of duty and corruption by our scumbag politicians if we penalized them by seizing their entire net worth and locking them in a pillory.

Everyone stop replying to the absolute clown who supports terminating the constitution.

Agreed with the first two paragraphs. Regarding the last line...now where did Fuzzy say that? Not saying that he didn't, and if his Cult Hero said it (which he did), not difficult to believe Fuzzy nodded along, but I'd still like to see a post with Fuzzy indicating as such.