What issue are you most right-wing on?

[Schiff for Senate]

Economic/trade issues; support overhaul of welfare (extreme welfare reform, such as random government checks on the homes of people recieving welfare cheques; if the person is using drugs/alcohol then cancel the paycheque permanently), and oppose affirmative action. Support free trade; not only is protectionism unfair, it has the effect of backfiring and/or causing a trade war which helps no one (though I do support some tarrifs and higher tarrifs against countries that use child labor and/or don't follow the environmental regulations American businesses have to, to make sure that such businesses are not given an unfair advantage for a lack of carefulness/regulation). Also I think that taxes on the lower class should be increased and should be lowered on the rich (though tax loopholes should be reduced).

EDIT - I'm also opposed to excessive ''wokeness.'' Racism is deplorable and should be called out, but people have to stop perceiving everything as being transphobic, homophobic, racist, etcetra, in some way or another. Related to this, I strongly oppose efforts to defund the police (abolishing it, which is what Rashida Tlaib suggested, is MTG-levels-crazy). Police reform may be necessary but I don't see what defunding the police will do aside from making crime more common. Also, I'm opposed to the eviction moratarium (if there still is one) for a number of reasons.

[Schiff for Senate]

Economic/trade issues; support overhaul of welfare (extreme welfare reform, such as random government checks on the homes of people recieving welfare cheques; if the person is using drugs/alcohol then cancel the paycheque permanently), and oppose affirmative action. Support free trade; not only is protectionism unfair, it has the effect of backfiring and/or causing a trade war which helps no one (though I do support some tarrifs and higher tarrifs against countries that use child labor and/or don't follow the environmental regulations American businesses have to, to make sure that such businesses are not given an unfair advantage for a lack of carefulness/regulation). Also I think that taxes on the lower class should be increased and should be lowered on the rich (though tax loopholes should be reduced).

Please, please do not give the GOP any ideas.

(And what the hell are you checking for?)

For drugs and/or a lot of alcohol; if they're a drug addict or alcoholic, then cancel their paycheque. Taxpayers shouldn't pay for someone to satisfy their alcoholism and/or drug addiction.

[Schiff for Senate]

Economic/trade issues; support overhaul of welfare (extreme welfare reform, such as random government checks on the homes of people recieving welfare cheques; if the person is using drugs/alcohol then cancel the paycheque permanently), and oppose affirmative action. Support free trade; not only is protectionism unfair, it has the effect of backfiring and/or causing a trade war which helps no one (though I do support some tarrifs and higher tarrifs against countries that use child labor and/or don't follow the environmental regulations American businesses have to, to make sure that such businesses are not given an unfair advantage for a lack of carefulness/regulation). Also I think that taxes on the lower class should be increased and should be lowered on the rich (though tax loopholes should be reduced).

Please, please do not give the GOP any ideas.

(And what the hell are you checking for?)

For drugs and/or a lot of alcohol; if they're a drug addict or alcoholic, then cancel their paycheque. Taxpayers shouldn't pay for someone to satisfy their alcoholism and/or drug addiction.

Yes, because drinking alcohol automatically means that you are an alcoholic.

No, I'm not saying they should have their paycheques cancelled just because there's alcohol in the house; most adults drink some amount of alcohol. But if it's obvious that they are alcoholics (i.e there is a lot of alcohol in the house) or drug users (i.e. there are drugs in the house), then put them of the welfare payroll.

[Schiff for Senate]

Economic/trade issues; support overhaul of welfare (extreme welfare reform, such as random government checks on the homes of people recieving welfare cheques; if the person is using drugs/alcohol then cancel the paycheque permanently), and oppose affirmative action. Support free trade; not only is protectionism unfair, it has the effect of backfiring and/or causing a trade war which helps no one (though I do support some tarrifs and higher tarrifs against countries that use child labor and/or don't follow the environmental regulations American businesses have to, to make sure that such businesses are not given an unfair advantage for a lack of carefulness/regulation). Also I think that taxes on the lower class should be increased and should be lowered on the rich (though tax loopholes should be reduced).

Please, please do not give the GOP any ideas.

(And what the hell are you checking for?)

For drugs and/or a lot of alcohol; if they're a drug addict or alcoholic, then cancel their paycheque. Taxpayers shouldn't pay for someone to satisfy their alcoholism and/or drug addiction.

Yes, because drinking alcohol automatically means that you are an alcoholic.

No, I'm not saying they should have their paycheques cancelled just because there's alcohol in the house; most adults drink some amount of alcohol. But if it's obvious that they are alcoholics (i.e there is a lot of alcohol in the house) or drug users (i.e. there are drugs in the house), then put them of the welfare payroll.

I have a lot of alcohol in my house because I like mixed drinks. I have one maybe once or twice a week. You can get lost.

Oh, okay. I wasn't aware that people did that, but I get your point - it can be misleading to see alcohol. And in that case they should check for just drugs - people who get welfare shouldn't be on drugs.

[Schiff for Senate]

Vegetarianism/veganism

for or against ?

I think he means he's against veganism/vegetarianism, because that's something usually supported by progressives who have health concerns or object to killing animals for their food, but I could be wrong.

[Schiff for Senate]

Economic/trade issues; support overhaul of welfare (extreme welfare reform, such as random government checks on the homes of people recieving welfare cheques; if the person is using drugs/alcohol then cancel the paycheque permanently), and oppose affirmative action. Support free trade; not only is protectionism unfair, it has the effect of backfiring and/or causing a trade war which helps no one (though I do support some tarrifs and higher tarrifs against countries that use child labor and/or don't follow the environmental regulations American businesses have to, to make sure that such businesses are not given an unfair advantage for a lack of carefulness/regulation). Also I think that taxes on the lower class should be increased and should be lowered on the rich (though tax loopholes should be reduced).

Please, please do not give the GOP any ideas.

(And what the hell are you checking for?)

For drugs and/or a lot of alcohol; if they're a drug addict or alcoholic, then cancel their paycheque. Taxpayers shouldn't pay for someone to satisfy their alcoholism and/or drug addiction.

Yes, because drinking alcohol automatically means that you are an alcoholic.

No, I'm not saying they should have their paycheques cancelled just because there's alcohol in the house; most adults drink some amount of alcohol. But if it's obvious that they are alcoholics (i.e there is a lot of alcohol in the house) or drug users (i.e. there are drugs in the house), then put them of the welfare payroll.

I have a lot of alcohol in my house because I like mixed drinks. I have one maybe once or twice a week. You can get lost.

Oh, okay. I wasn't aware that people did that, but I get your point - it can be misleading to see alcohol. And in that case they should check for just drugs - people who get welfare shouldn't be on drugs.

People who don't get welfare shouldn't be on drugs either, and yet here we are. You have to meet people where they are.

I know, and while it would be preferable for no one, not even non-welfare recipients to have drugs (not that there should be a law banning drugs), if  the government isn't assisting you, it shouldn't be there business whether or not you have drugs. But if you're receiving money from the government (i.e. welfare) and using that money to buy drugs, that's much worse - because you're using the taxpayers' money to fulfill your own drug addiction, and people who work 8 hours a day need to spend some of their hard-earned money so you can have your drugs. While the majority of people on welfare don't abuse the system like this, some do, and that's why they shouldn't get any welfare paycheques.