Opinion of the Previous Poster's Signature V: You Only Live Twice

[Schiff for Senate]

Nice signature that shows your opinion on LGBTQ rights.

[Schiff for Senate]

Nice, informational signature that conveys who you are and what your political ideology is.

[Schiff for Senate]

Nice signature that can be summarised by the facts that you like LBJ and liberals (whether they are Democrats like Gore or Republicans like Rockefeller). Also pretty cool picture of President Biden.

[Schiff for Senate]

All right, but nothing too special.

[Schiff for Senate]

The picture and the final quote suit her aesthetic well.

Neutral, but it looks interesting enough.

[Schiff for Senate]

The quote is funny, though Dule's made some other much better jokes).
The song is good, though I'm not entirely sure of the context.
The image seems nice, because of the reptile, though I'm not entirely sure about what's written in Ukrainian/Russian.

[Schiff for Senate]

ew

Good signature.
The meme says a lot about your views/personality.
And it is right - it's not necessarily bad that people are criticizing you. Depending on the poster who's criticizing you and the subject they're criticizing you on, criticism could be a good sign. Some people aren't worth pleasing and it's better to get criticism from them than praise. Of course, those people and those positions are probably what we'll have disagreement on, but your signature alone is 100% right.

[Schiff for Senate]

Offers your political beliefs in a more interesting tone and structure than most. It's become one of the more well-known signatures on this site for good reason.

Thanks!
It was inspired by Chips' signature - which also provides a brief description of who he is and a few of his political views.

As for you, I don't know exactly what the signature references/means (and what the Pink Panther Party is), but it's nice and concise.

[Schiff for Senate]

First two lines are good.
Third is horrid.
Fourth is well-meaning but 'thoughts and prayers' itself sounds insincere since it's that line the GOP always insincerely doles out after mass gun violence in place of actual solutions.
Fifth seems good but I haven't read the timeline; seems interesting though.

The endorsements are mostly bad. Agree on only CO-GOV and MO-SEN, disagree on AL-SEN (Brooks is a far-right and very dangerous figure who crashed and burned even when Trump endorsed him - and by the way even Trump now unendorsed him), WA-03 (Herrera-Buetler is one of the best GOP representatives and supporting Trump's 2nd impeachment was a major FF move that required placing principle above partisanship), and OH-GOV (DeWine is one of the saner and better Republicans and aside from not hating masks/the vaccine, I'm honestly unaware what he's done to anger you - in contrast, Renacci is a clown and known underperformer/loser/weak candidate). Don't feel very strongly about the NY ones (don't know a whole lot about NY state politics anyway) either way though given that both endorsements are of partisan Republicans, lean against on both. But again, don't know/care all that much. Lastly, disagree on OH SEN and AZ SEN, but not nearly as strongly as I do on OH-GOV, WA-03 and AL-SEN (frankly, your endorsements in those races downright disappoint me).

The Olawakandi quote is good, though if I'm being honest, the entire cult of personality around Olawakandi has gotten a bit old/overused.

[Schiff for Senate]

While it is based to have Jeb! in your signature, I don't personally agree with that quote

Why? Do you know how many years it can take to get a green card? Opposing illegal immigration is very understandable, but I don't understand what the problem with making legal immigration a little easier is. And as for those already here, yes, I agree they shouldn't have come, but if they aren't committing crimes and are being 'pillars of the community,' I really fail to see what purpose it really serves to just deport them. Yes, they came illegally. No, if they then live in America for a long time and do not commit any crimes and live their lives fine, it's better to pull them out of the shadows and let them and their children live a normal life than ostracize them and deport them.

Anyway, as for you, what I said earlier [see below], but it's improved a little now that the Renacci endorsement has gone and has been replaced with an endorsement of someone challenging Greene (which I agree with - anyone but Greene for GA14).

First two lines are good.
Third is horrid.
Fourth is well-meaning but 'thoughts and prayers' itself sounds insincere since it's that line the GOP always insincerely doles out after mass gun violence in place of actual solutions.
Fifth seems good but I haven't read the timeline; seems interesting though.

The endorsements are mostly bad. Agree on only CO-GOV and MO-SEN, disagree on AL-SEN (Brooks is a far-right and very dangerous figure who crashed and burned even when Trump endorsed him - and by the way even Trump now unendorsed him), WA-03 (Herrera-Buetler is one of the best GOP representatives and supporting Trump's 2nd impeachment was a major FF move that required placing principle above partisanship), and OH-GOV (DeWine is one of the saner and better Republicans and aside from not hating masks/the vaccine, I'm honestly unaware what he's done to anger you - in contrast, Renacci is a clown and known underperformer/loser/weak candidate). Don't feel very strongly about the NY ones (don't know a whole lot about NY state politics anyway) either way though given that both endorsements are of partisan Republicans, lean against on both. But again, don't know/care all that much. Lastly, disagree on OH SEN and AZ SEN, but not nearly as strongly as I do on OH-GOV, WA-03 and AL-SEN (frankly, your endorsements in those races downright disappoint me).

The Olawakandi quote is good, though if I'm being honest, the entire cult of personality around Olawakandi has gotten a bit old/overused.

[Schiff for Senate]

Disagree with its content (taken either ironically or unironically). But leaving that aside, well, it's a good example of sarcasm used to express one's sentiments well, and I have nothing but respect for that art.

An iconic hodgepodge of colour and chaos.  

[Schiff for Senate]

Still boring.

Based, but you've made better memes and had better signatures.

[Schiff for Senate]

Yankee is right.

Jeb! is based, and so is that particular quote of is. I mean, as I mentioned to Greg earlier, we should be tough on people who try to come here illegally, but we should also a.) make legal immigration a tad easier and b.) allow people who've lived here for many years without harming anybody and without committing any crimes to come out of the shadows instead of leaving them there, or worse, deporting them.

[Schiff for Senate]

What I said earlier [see below], but it's improved a little now that the Renacci endorsement has gone and has been replaced with an endorsement of someone challenging Greene (which I agree with - anyone but Greene for GA14).

First two lines are good.
Third is horrid.
Fourth is well-meaning but 'thoughts and prayers' itself sounds insincere since it's that line the GOP always insincerely doles out after mass gun violence in place of actual solutions.
Fifth seems good but I haven't read the timeline; seems interesting though.

The endorsements are mostly bad. Agree on only CO-GOV and MO-SEN, disagree on AL-SEN (Brooks is a far-right and very dangerous figure who crashed and burned even when Trump endorsed him - and by the way even Trump now unendorsed him), WA-03 (Herrera-Buetler is one of the best GOP representatives and supporting Trump's 2nd impeachment was a major FF move that required placing principle above partisanship), and OH-GOV (DeWine is one of the saner and better Republicans and aside from not hating masks/the vaccine, I'm honestly unaware what he's done to anger you - in contrast, Renacci is a clown and known underperformer/loser/weak candidate). Don't feel very strongly about the NY ones (don't know a whole lot about NY state politics anyway) either way though given that both endorsements are of partisan Republicans, lean against on both. But again, don't know/care all that much. Lastly, disagree on OH SEN and AZ SEN, but not nearly as strongly as I do on OH-GOV, WA-03 and AL-SEN (frankly, your endorsements in those races downright disappoint me).

The Olawakandi quote is good, though if I'm being honest, the entire cult of personality around Olawakandi has gotten a bit old/overused.

EDIT: I also notice, upon more closely examining your signature, you replaced the infamous words "Thoughts and prayers" with the neutral "We must stand with." I approve of this.



So I guess, if I was to avoid focusing too much on your endorsements, it's a good signature. At the very least, it's improving.

[Schiff for Senate]

Don't fully understand the GIF, but it seems good. Freedom Signature.

[Schiff for Senate]

It’s pretty descriptive but dense. I think Chips’s might be the tiniest bit better.

Actually, my signature was more or less modelled on / based on / inspired by Chips'. I saw his signature in May/June when I registered and considered it to be effecient and neat, so I made myself a somewhat similar signature.

As for you, the signature seems good, though I don't get the image of the reptile and I don't know what's written in Ukranian/Russian.

EDIT: Pink Panther posted in between. His signature is okay, though I don't get what the 'Pink Panther Party' is.

[Schiff for Senate]

I actually like it.

The image of Biden is nice. The rest of the signature is good too (and I more or less agree with much of it).

[Schiff for Senate]

Top 5 signatures in terms of artistic quality, probably Top 3 but at that stage it gets hard to be sure.

I don't speak Russian so I don't understand what it means

?
There's an English translation right below it.

Anyway, as for yours, I disagree with the endorsements for WA03 (Herrera Buetler is one of the best GOPers in Congress), AL-SEN (I'm for Britt, at least in the primary), OH-SEN (Ryan is objectively much more #populist and for the working class than a San F venture capitalist who is known for branzely taking a 180 degree turn on certain issues - cough, cough, Trump - if makes sense politically to do so), AZ-SEN (Theil-backed guy who's been supportive of the Big Lie? Not exactly my cup of tea) and MA-GOV (though I admit I'm not entirely sure who Diehl is, I'm quite confident I won't like what I find unless he's Charlie Baker 2.0, which based on how the forum's been discussing him, I don't think he is).

As for the rest of it, as an agnostic Hindu, I can't say the first line appeals to me. It's not SECULAR. The second and third sentences describes you fairly well but, as others have observed, ironically it's pretty much the total opposite of my own political views. As for the fourth line, I stand opposed to authoritarianism in theory (though I confess on...certain issues I can have very authoritarian views/tendancies, or at least views less libertarian than average) and I do oppose communism and facism; however, I am a free trade supporter. I'm not entirely sure what you mean by 'civic nationalist' but if it's remotely close to BG-NY's views on immigration and immigrants, I am a thousand percent in disagreement with it. As for "Former Democrat: The Party left me," I think it's less of the Democrats moving away from you ideologically than the GOP growing closer to you ideologically (Trump's populism, protectionism and nationalism really moved the GOP closer to your own views - and, of course, further from my own).

[Schiff for Senate]

A thousand percent opposed to Court packing.
As to your endorsements, very generic D. I'm neutral or in mild agreement to the vast majority.

[Schiff for Senate]

The quote isn’t particularly funny. Meh.

[Schiff for Senate]

Meme signatures are not funny.

The predictions seem a tad pessimistic but they’re not crazy or impossible. The endorsements are Standard D, and I agree with the vast majority because D > R. Disagree with court packing (and it’d open a whole new can of worms 🐛), but I get your frustration and where you’re coming from, since the appointment of ACB and the treatment of Garland were both outrageous and unacceptable.

[Schiff for Senate]

An iconic signature. The only way to make it better would be to include even more candidates.

A tad spooked, but mostly just confused.

Do you know the probabilities of the Congress in 2022 it's a 50 percent Divided Govt 235/218 Speaker McCarthy and ,51/55 D Senate Leader Schumer, 40 percent chance of a Secularist Trifecta 218/217 DH and 55 Senate seats and 10 percent chance of an all R Congress 245 RH and 54 RSen forget it Rs you aren't gonna win everything

D's will get to 60 seats with the Senate map before Rs get to 55 seats

Freedom signature ofc.

[Schiff for Senate]

It makes my head hurt, but that's not hard to do.

Good signature; it concisely states who PQG is, who she supports and who she looks up to.

[Schiff for Senate]

Over-the-top. Sure, going after Trump and now Perry is a freedom move, but it's not nearly enough to warrant love for the FBI.

[Schiff for Senate]

A bit much (and this is after I've moved significantly to the left on economic issues since May/June).