How Come Gore Didn't Pick a Female VP in 2000? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 02:18:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  How Come Gore Didn't Pick a Female VP in 2000? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How Come Gore Didn't Pick a Female VP in 2000?  (Read 5304 times)
hcallega
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,523
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.10, S: -3.90

« on: February 02, 2010, 06:52:16 PM »

Probably because he didn't make any good decisions during the entire campaign.

"OH HAI GUYZ IMA BE A POPALIST NOW!!!!!!"
"OH TIME FOR JOE LOSERMAN TO BE MAH VEEP!!!! YISRAEL!!!!"
"SIGH.... I AM SO MUCH SMARTER THAN GEORGE DA BUSH!!!!"

But in all seriousness, I do not like Mr. Gore nor would I have voted for him.
Logged
hcallega
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,523
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.10, S: -3.90

« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2010, 07:42:07 PM »

Gore probably would have lost in 2004 due in large part to the War on Terror and the economy. As we are seeing with Obama, no matter what a liberal does he will get hammered on foreign policy. Also the economy wouldn't have been so great, as we had relatively high unemployment in  03-04. Gore was a terrible campaigner and I believe would have lost to a half-decent McCain effort. If he passed a tax cut maybe the economy would be in better shape, but if not than it's doubtfull.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.