Should the US Subsidize Pharmacy Companies? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2024, 11:49:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Should the US Subsidize Pharmacy Companies? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should We Continue?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 23

Author Topic: Should the US Subsidize Pharmacy Companies?  (Read 1028 times)
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,808
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

« on: August 19, 2016, 02:25:26 PM »

Big Pharma collectively makes about 712 billion a year, and yet we shell out an average of 270 billion in subsidies from taxpayers. Should we continue to subsidize them? That's like half the deficit right there.

I'm guessing most of this is from Medicare, Medicaid, insurance subsidies, etc?

I would think so. Unless I saw a detailed list of "subsidies" in question, my gut reaction would be a resounding NO. Even most grant-work seems more than worthwhile - and not necessarily for "Big" Pharma.
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,808
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

« Reply #1 on: August 19, 2016, 10:31:39 PM »

Not shown in this chart, the literally 20,000 drug companies that literally have a drug or two in their pipeline. They may as well be showing the profits of oil companies because that's how related those two statistics are. Geez.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 14 queries.