I would like to note that there is a moderator policy of deleting the defendant's posts. So it is fully possible that this is the reason behind that mysterious deletion.
Gus, what good would that solve? If that's the moderators way of combating trolls, that's one hell of a stupid way to do so. Then again, its not like my word on this matter really matters as the deleting will still occur, despite its stupidity.
1. There is no way through which we can fight the trolls other than post-deleting. So, if you know of another way of combating trolls, feel free to share.
2. It "solves the good" of a) punishing people who troll by showing them that it won't be accepted and b) keeps their trollishness out.
3. If you have any actual argument to bring forward against this policy (such as what makes it bad) beyond calling it stupid in every sentence I am perfectly willing to listen. It is, however, perfectly correct of you to note that I will not let my actions be determined by a poster calling them stupid.
(the same but in less harsh terms apply to Lewis. I would like to remind you though that account-hacking is not "arguably trollish")
Delete with discretion? Or focus on those posts that are, in fact trollish. The policy is good, but across-the-board implementation is not.
