Capital Gains Tax Co-Operative Bill (law'd) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 03:26:19 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Capital Gains Tax Co-Operative Bill (law'd) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Capital Gains Tax Co-Operative Bill (law'd)  (Read 3366 times)
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


« on: March 06, 2010, 02:54:17 PM »

This would encourage a far more diversified and fair economy. If workers are able to control their own workplace, they would have their own voice in the management of the company and it would also discourage less co-operative methods used by workers, such as strikes and go-slows. Therefore, I urge the Senate to pass this bill.
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


« Reply #1 on: March 06, 2010, 05:13:08 PM »

I think "workers" should be defined here. Is the CEO a "worker" of a company?

Everyone who is employed in the company.
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


« Reply #2 on: March 07, 2010, 10:06:20 AM »

I think "workers" should be defined here. Is the CEO a "worker" of a company?

Everyone who is employed in the company.

Then I oppose this bill. This would be good only for management.

With an income limit of $ 50,000, I would support this bill.

Hmm. What does everyone else think of this idea?
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


« Reply #3 on: March 07, 2010, 12:50:12 PM »

I think "workers" should be defined here. Is the CEO a "worker" of a company?

Everyone who is employed in the company.

Then I oppose this bill. This would be good only for management.

With an income limit of $ 50,000, I would support this bill.

Hmm. What does everyone else think of this idea?

Overall I LOVE this bill. Wish I'd thought of it. Angry

Regarding the amendment, I'm not opposed to it per se, but question whether ir is necessary. Winston, can you tell us whether CEO's and the like are actually subject to the RL legal provisions of ESOP's?

I'm not sure.
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


« Reply #4 on: March 08, 2010, 04:11:04 PM »

In that case, I'd like to offer an amendment:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


« Reply #5 on: March 09, 2010, 04:05:27 PM »

That seems good... are you going to offer an amendment?
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


« Reply #6 on: March 10, 2010, 04:26:19 PM »

Whenever you feel ready Smiley
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2010, 04:13:19 PM »

This seems to be in order. What does everyone else think? Should I propose the rewritten bill?
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


« Reply #8 on: March 15, 2010, 04:04:21 PM »

Aye
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


« Reply #9 on: March 22, 2010, 04:23:27 PM »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 10 queries.