Republicans win VG and NJ. What does this mean... (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 03:27:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Republicans win VG and NJ. What does this mean... (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Republicans win VG and NJ. What does this mean...  (Read 3553 times)
politicaladdict
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 258
« on: November 04, 2009, 07:28:15 PM »



Christie(R) won in NJ by an amazing four ponts apart in a heavily democrat-state  49%-45%. Very unispected.

Previously, Whitman(R) won by just one point, 49%-48% and again in 47%-46%.

Mcdonnell(R) won in Virginia by a whopping 19 points 59%-41%. Which is said to be a whopping gap in Virginian history after the 1800s.

John Garamendi(D) won by just ten points 53%-43% in the 10th district of Claifornia. It was previously democrats usually leading by atleast 65%-33% since 2000.

Now the libs kept saying that if Mcdonnell wins it's not a big deal to Obama because huge African American tounout won't come out this year.

I bete they weren't expecting the huge Viginian gap and Christie four point gap.

But now, it seems that if all African American came out to vote for Deeds we would still win the state based on the numeral gap.

And Christie won by more than anybody thought and could probably gotten more without Daggett in there.

Could this be reflection on Obama?

This is what I think, Christie's victory in NJ due to Corzine's very, very unpopularity, and to a lesser extent, Obama.

Virginia, I think, IS  a clear reflection on Obama's policies.

And VG and NJ both went for Obama by comfertably margins.

The 10th district of Cali that Garamendi won happen to be a very liberal district anyways. And the democrats still got about an average of thirty-three points even when the republicans still had the house in 2002. Does a twenty-three point lower atleast show some kind of trend that the republicans might get the house back?

It just seems elections since Obama became president, despite who wins, seems to go less and less for democrats.

And the conservative Hoffman lost by just four points 49%-45% in a republican district that went for Obama. Atleast Hoffman pulled off knocking a lib rep out and got pretty good margin despite not even living in that district.


You thoughts about these issues.
Logged
politicaladdict
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 258
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2009, 07:34:59 PM »

Republicans win VG and NJ. What does this mean...

VG? What does this mean?

Sorry! i ment VA.
Logged
politicaladdict
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 258
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2009, 07:36:04 PM »

Wait, the Republicans won?  What?


WHY HASN'T ANYONE POSTED THIS YET??  THIS SITE IS FILLED WITH LIBERAL BIASES

What do you mean what? They won in VA and NJ.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.