Unintended consequence or deliberate attack on the poor and elderly? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 04:35:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Unintended consequence or deliberate attack on the poor and elderly? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: IS the Michigan cigarette tax a deliberate attack on the poor and elderly?
#1
Deliberate attack
 
#2
No the Michigan government just screwed up.
 
#3
other -explain
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 17

Author Topic: Unintended consequence or deliberate attack on the poor and elderly?  (Read 3386 times)
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

« on: June 06, 2006, 09:12:17 PM »

I've got an idea: don't buy cigarettes...

Of course this wasn't a "deliberate attack on the poor and elderly".  Don't be silly.

correct, gabu.

i believe cigarette taxes are far too low.  why not exploit the addictions of the ignorant?
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

« Reply #1 on: June 06, 2006, 09:29:16 PM »

Lets take an example; Rich man earns $100,000 per year. Poor man earns $10,000. Both men smoke a pack a day. At $2.00 per pack the annual tax for both men is $730. The effective tax rate as a percentage of income is as follows:
Rich man  0.73%
Poor man  7.3%

Its odd to see so many Democrats supporting such a regressive tax.

it's a voluntary tax.  no one is forced to pay it.  

it is odd to see libertarians oppose voluntary taxation.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2006, 09:33:33 AM »

And don't forget the tobacco subsidies to encourage production in the first place. What a system!

i thought the subsidies ended a few years ago when they had the buyout program?
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2006, 10:33:11 AM »

I would be open to the idea of an unhealthy food tax to help pay for the cost of health care.

Please tell me you're joking.

that is actually a good idea!

why not a fast food tax.  1. it would raise reveues.  2. it would help to discourage teens (many of whom are obese) from eating there.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2006, 11:02:04 AM »

I would be open to the idea of an unhealthy food tax to help pay for the cost of health care.

Please tell me you're joking.

that is actually a good idea!

why not a fast food tax.  1. it would raise reveues.  2. it would help to discourage teens (many of whom are obese) from eating there.

Why do you hate freedom?

freedom isnt free.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 15 queries.