Why wasn’t the Hochulmander upheld? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 10:36:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Why wasn’t the Hochulmander upheld? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why wasn’t the Hochulmander upheld?  (Read 370 times)
Buffalo Mayor Young Kim
LVScreenssuck
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,449


« on: May 21, 2022, 01:38:17 PM »

Because technocratic liberals are fundamentally useful idiots that will choose what keeps their hands the cleanest over the good of the nation every damn time.
Logged
Buffalo Mayor Young Kim
LVScreenssuck
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,449


« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2022, 04:23:04 PM »

Unlike Texas, New York has an anti-gerrymandering provision in its Constitution. And unlike Florida the map did not look clean or compact.

Can we put this talking point to rest already? You'd think every online conservative is on DeSantis's payroll. FL-14 is obviously not clean or compact, neither is FL-07 frankly.
Florida's map is very compact for the most part, actually. Now, if you want a map that's not clean or compact, just look at Illinois

Every conservative talking about redistricting has a dialogue tree. Clean and compact, partisan fairness is fake, counties don't matter, water doesn't matter except when it does, let's start talking about Illinois now.

Yes, because a district that goes from Danville to Hyde Park is the epitome of fairness.
1) We can’t have ‘fair’ federal maps until everyone has fair maps.

It’s not like the house of Reps is only from Illinois or New York or whatever. If one state is draws maps to favor their majority party and the other draws maps to be representative, what you’ve done is created an aggregate map that favors the dominant party in the former state.

2) You’ve accidentally stumbled ass backwards into a better question. Is not more fair to run an ugly looking district from eg the Metro-East to Springfield and combine them into a single urban centers district rather than have all three drown out by the rural hinterlands? Congressmen represent people not trees, and I think it’s fair to assume that the voters of Belleville and Springfield will have more influence over their local congressman than they did in their old districts. Community of interest should trump compactness, as the later doesn’t really mean much other than making maps look pretty.
Logged
Buffalo Mayor Young Kim
LVScreenssuck
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,449


« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2022, 04:24:56 PM »

Because the state had a law banning it on the books and Hochul and the legislature just basically went "Lol, don't wanna". It was a state issue, not a larger one about gerrymandering.
Yes and every dipsh**t that thought the solution to red state gerrymandering is to make sure Republicans in blue states get a fair shake should shut the hell up right about now.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 10 queries.