Wealthiest Republican supporter in Ohio quits party, praises Obama (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 10:33:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Wealthiest Republican supporter in Ohio quits party, praises Obama (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Wealthiest Republican supporter in Ohio quits party, praises Obama  (Read 5252 times)
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,120


« on: September 15, 2018, 01:06:10 PM »

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/406822-wealthiest-republican-supporter-in-ohio-quits-party

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,120


« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2018, 01:27:52 PM »

I'd have thought this would be great news for Democrats.

Me too.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,120


« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2018, 05:41:27 PM »

He didn't become a Democrat, he's now an independent.

Also, he didn't say that he would support Democrats. He just liked President Obama's personality.

This.

Good job, Mr. Wexner. It took you entirely too long, but thank you for admitting what kind of place the Republican party is in and voting with your feet. I hope many more follow your example.

Well, not quite.

Ohio is a state that does not have party registration.  It is the polar opposite of New York, which has party registration that makes it impossible to switch your registration to vote in another party's primary for up to almost two (2) years after you switch.  In Ohio, the party whose ballot you request is the party you are a member of; if you don't request a partisan ballot, you are an unaffiliated voter.

If he votes in all Democratic Primaries, he's a Democrat (in fact).

I'll say this:  I still don't get it why Democrats view this as a negative.  They are looking a Billion Dollar Gift Horse in the mouth, are they not? 

Oh yes, the Democratic party clearly needs more rich neoliberals because there aren't enough already. If only another million Meg Whitmans had joined, Hillary would have won.

Supporting Hillary did not magically convert a Republican into a Democrat.  Whitman is still a Republican.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 11 queries.