A post of mine was moderated in this thread under some supposed “trolling” justification, which I think it just evidences the liberal biased censorship going on.
Let’s put it this more detailed way, if it were a liberal main leadership like Joe Biden being shot with murder intentions in the USA, very specific things would be said about the motivation of the shooter and the discourse would be completely dominated about how “ideological extremists” are responsible for increased political violence just based on very natural speculations.
But because the guy being shot was an ex-communist; current socdem nationalist that appeals to non-liberal sectors of the right and left; people cannot speculate that it was a violent liberal who shot the guy?
You guys work with a very incorrect “left-right axis” premise that liberalism is somehow the “moderate educated center” and therefore it cannot ever become extreme or violent. That’s why you believe I was trolling when I was clearly not.
Reality is, EVERY existing ideology can be extreme whenever it becomes too inflexible (that includes liberalism yeah) and every ideology can always resort to violence in order to achieve its goals. The truth never works under a “Black vs White” simplistic lens that automatically assumes one side is always inherently evil and the other side is always good.
CNN itself characterizes the attack against PM Fico as “politically motivated”. So it’s nothing out of this world to speculate that the person who would feel politically motivated to shoot that specific PM would be in the opposite side of the political spectrum as him, aka: a liberal. Shockingly, they can be evil too sometimes and admitting it is no big deal.
