Why are we not expanding the house numbers? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 04:09:11 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Why are we not expanding the house numbers? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why are we not expanding the house numbers?  (Read 820 times)
kwabbit
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,977


« on: November 20, 2020, 08:22:37 PM »

Because 538 and 270towin would have to change their names.
Logged
kwabbit
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,977


« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2020, 08:28:41 PM »

More seriously, the fact that members would have to vote to dilute their power is a big obstacle. There's not really any energy for it either. Like expanding the house might help Democrats at the margin but not as much as making PR or DC states would or as much as any other structural reform. Apparently the capitol can only support about 600 anyway. 497 is a weird number, but it prevents a tie and then there are 600 electoral votes. 535, a simple 100 vote increase could also be fine. The Wyoming rule would give 568 members, but that could be weird since it could lead to a contraction or expansion depending on Wyoming's pop growth. The cube root rule would yield to many members to fit.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 12 queries.