Did Rome have better governments during the Republic? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 20, 2024, 11:18:19 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Did Rome have better governments during the Republic? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Did Rome have better governments during the Republic?  (Read 1182 times)
Samof94
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,467
United States


« on: October 03, 2020, 05:23:22 AM »


The conventional answer to this is that victory in the Second Punic War opened up unbridgeable class tensions between the increasingly wealthy nobiles and the increasingly impoverished mass of the people. Not only was there a huge influx of wealth and slave labour from Rome becoming the dominant power in the Mediterranean, but smallholding citizen-soldiers who were supposed to be the bedrock of the Republic's armies were bankrupted by Hannibal's devastation of Italy and then required to go on far-flung military campaigns for years without compensation while their farms were left to ruin. The violent refusal of land reform by the Senate necessitated the opening up of the army to landless citizens who were then in the debt of the generals who lead them, which they exploited to gain political power by arms. And so on.
They tried land reform under Gracchus, but he was assassinated.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.