It's Perro Sanxe wot won it
Mimoha
Jr. Member
Posts: 833
Political Matrix E: -4.65, S: -5.22
|
|
« on: April 24, 2021, 11:43:16 AM » |
|
I’ve noticed that a lot of elections all over the world were decided by narrow margins during the 2000s, even by ridiculously small ones in many cases. Here are some examples:
Germany 2002: SPD beats the CDU/CSU by less than 10.000 votes, Red-Green retains a slender majority in the Bundestag.
Germany 2005: CDU/CSU emerges as the largest party by an unexpectedly close 1% margin.
Austria 2005: In a reverse of the German result, it is the SPÖ that beats the ÖVP by 1%.
Italy 2006: Romano Prodi’s center-left Olive coalition wins by 0.1%, defeating Berlusconi 49.8-49.7.
Greece 2000: PASOK obtains a narrow 1% edge over New Democracy.
United States 2000: Bush infamously carries Florida and the presidency by just 537 votes.
Hungary 2002 and 2006: 1% wins for the MSZP.
Norway 2005 and 2009: Red-Green coalition obtains slim majorities, while narrowly losing the popular vote to the opposition.
Mexico 2006: Closest presidential election in the country’s history, it is decided by less than 1%.
Taiwan 2004: Chen Shui-bian wins reelection 50.1%-49.9%
Any ideas why all these races were such nail-bitters? Is there no common root?
|