New Yorker: "The Republican Identity Crisis After Trump" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 06:33:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  New Yorker: "The Republican Identity Crisis After Trump" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: New Yorker: "The Republican Identity Crisis After Trump"  (Read 2434 times)
Alcibiades
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,945
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -6.96

P P
« on: October 26, 2020, 06:15:40 AM »
« edited: October 26, 2020, 06:18:48 AM by Alcibiades »

If I were to sum up "Trumpism" in a sentence as far as it relates to what kind of party the GOP is/will be, I would say that the Trump GOP is a party that welcomed the Ross Perot Republicans back into the fold and forced the movement conservatives to tolerate them.

The days of the race for the GOP nomination being a litmus test for "who's the most conservative" are over.  


Isn't the GOP nomination a "Who is the most Trumpist" litmus test now though?


Not really, no.  There is more diversity in issue positions amongst Republicans these days.  As long as the candidate endorses Trump, there is wiggle room for issue positions.

At one time a guy like Jeff Van Drew would have been primaried out of office even after switching parties due to being recruited for being insufficiently conservative.  The GOP is over that now.  Van Drew is a moderate Republican, but he'll be OK so long as he supports the national ticket (which he does).  

Van Drew is an interesting example, but would you not agree that, with the exception of trade and perhaps foreign policy, and in spite of his rhetoric, Trump has essentially governed like a standard movement conservative, policy-wise? From the tax cuts and attempted repeal of Obamacare to the appointments of conservative judges, his domestic social and economic policy has to a large extent been a continuation of GOP orthodoxy. For his first two years, he basically supported whichever legislative initiatives Paul Ryan did, and he’s let the Federalist Society hand-pick his judges.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 11 queries.