[[[results available]]] EPONA social policy poll (2016·07)

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1AvLxmRHB1TgeP7POh-_GwWh787j_s281lYmaVNsQWnE/viewform

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

an early result:

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

bʌmp

please vote if you haven't yet

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

one more day, y'alls

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

EPONA social policy poll (2016·07)
—
sample of 28 voters weighted by party registration
—

	support	neutral etc	oppose
lgbtq+ rights, in general	77		23
—gay marriage	71	5	23
—public discrimination ban	84	8	8
—private discrimination ban	65	13	22
—mandated h.r.t. coverage	36	25	39
—access to puberty blockers	29	32	39
—anti-bullying/sex-ed funding	57	14	29
—conversion therapy ban	79	6	16
—abolition of gender markers	23	18	59
—genital normalisation surgery ban	50	29	21
gun control, in general	60		40
—universal background checks	82	6	13
—nationwide gun registry	53	3	44
—high-capacity magazine ban	49	12	40
—"military features" ban	45	9	46
—blanket gun ban	6	6	88
legality of abortion, in general	56		44
death penalty, in general	29		71
environmental protection laws, in general	82		18
feminism, in general	57		43
free immigration, in general	58		42
regions' rights, in general	65		35

specific subsamples/crosstabs available on request (i just can't be arsed to break everything down right now lol)

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

EPONA social policy poll (2016·07)
—
cross-tabs — pro-life/pro-choice & pro-/anti-death penalty
—

	pro-choice	pro-life	pro-death pen.	anti-death pen.
federalist	15	85	46	54
labor	100	0	0	100
others	50	50	25	75
north	77	23	15	85
south	33	67	33	67
west	33	67	33	67
pro-choice	(100)	(0)	7	93
pro-life	(0)	(100)	46	54
pro-death pen.	14	86	(100)	(0)
anti-death pen.	67	33	(0)	(100)

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

why is there a higher percentage in favour of private, rather than public bans on discrimination? Often its the other way round

i think you're misreading?