Things they so willingly overlooked or even downright supported when it came from Trump.
I can't believe you are taking yourself seriously. T***p is a wild card and is ignorant of the way government works, but I have no knowledge of him ever asking anyone not to serve anyone fast food based on their political ideologies or anything else. Moreover, there is no evidence that either of these two women ever supported such a policy either. Are you clairvoyant or merely exceedingly presumptuous? In any case, attacking them here on this forum does not make them guilty of any wrongdoing. So they want to vote for a different person than you're planning on voting for. If I only worked with those who are voting for the same candidate that I'm voting for, then I'd only be able to serve about 1% of the population, because that's probably how many will vote for the candidate that I'll support in November. There's no logical defense of the server's attitude and there's no logical reason to attack these innocent customers. The server not only was being hateful and bigoted, but created martyrs for a madman's campaign to control the national economy. At best she only made herself look like an asshole; at worst she created sympathy for T***p supporters, thus her actions were not only rude, but also short-sighted and illogical.
Freedom of speech and freedom to associate is fine as long as it is speech you agree with and associations you would form yourself. The real challenge is to protect those with whom you disagree. They, too, have every right to be free from harassment when attempting to purchase food from a restaurant. These customers did nothing wrong, but were met with unabashed belligerence from a narrow-minded bigot. From what I can tell the management dealt with the employee decisively and fairly. I would not want such unreliable, inflammatory, and hateful person in my employ, regardless of whether I agreed with that person's political philosophy.
i can't believe this has to be explained so often – the stubby-fingered rapist's campaign has gone far beyond representing a ~political ideology with which you disagree~, it's outside the democratic political spectrum and antithetical to civilisation as a whole. nobody would be making this kind of argument about rubio or even cruz.
