Republicans are winning the war on women... (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 09:06:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Republicans are winning the war on women... (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Republicans are winning the war on women...  (Read 6045 times)
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
a Person
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,735
Antarctica


WWW
« on: August 05, 2013, 08:59:45 AM »

You people believe this stuff? The "war on women" is propaganda designed to rouse the rabble.

Republicans have mothers, wives, and daughters they care about. They're people too, believe it or not.

There is a reason why so few female politicians are Republican.  In state legislatures in 2013, for instance, Democratic women outnumber GOP women 1037D-632R.

In Congress, Democratic women outnumber their Republican counterparts 16D-4R in the U.S. Senate and 59D-19R in the House.

And the GOP, the party which has few women in it, is the one which is tone-deaf or hostile to women's rights on everything from reproductive health care to violence against women to equal pay to family leave.

Perhaps you see no connection between these policies and the lack of women in your ranks.  I think otherwise.
632 is just a few?

Yes.  How would you explain the fact that Democratic women greatly outnumber their Republican counterparts?  In the U.S. Senate, which represents high-level political office, only 20% of the female senators are Republican.  Republican women senators make up 9% of the GOP Senate caucus.  In the House, Republican women make up 8% of their caucus.

Democratic women are 29% of their caucus in the House and Senate.





It's interesting that you omitted governor's mansions.

I've never seen someone so proud of 13% in my life.


It's interesting that you omit the companion number to that figure.

Oh, wait, it's not.
krazen has half a point for once. The relevant number would be 80%: 4 of the 5 female Governors are Republican (although this includes virulently anti-women ones like Mary Fallin)

It's also a much smaller set than Senators etc, though.
Logged
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
a Person
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,735
Antarctica


WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2013, 11:47:47 PM »


That stat's irrelevant and completely misses my point. 1/20 may be pretty shameful, but when you put the fact that there are 30 GOP governors now into context, having 4 be women really isn't something to hang your hat on. Trumpeting the fact that around one of eight of your governors are female is a joke of a talking point and you're a fool if you believe this rebukes any of the gender gap.

I hate how people judge a group based on their 'diversity'.


Who gives a flying crap if they have 100% males or 100% females. I thought we lived in a country where 'whats on the inside' is what really matters. Its how and what they do, not who they are.....


The New England congressional delegation is a white dominated zone. Diversity is just something that they talk about.
New England as a whole is very white, bru.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.