VA, Gravis Marketing: Romney leads by 5 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2024, 05:39:49 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  VA, Gravis Marketing: Romney leads by 5 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: VA, Gravis Marketing: Romney leads by 5  (Read 3063 times)
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
a Person
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,735
Antarctica


WWW
« on: September 11, 2012, 02:35:27 PM »

Bet PPP or survey USA would have Obama up 6 there at the moment. Makes no sense, and Gravis has no proven track record to deserve any benefit of doubt.

The typical forum response to anything that doesn't show the Democrats leading...oh it must not have any accuracy whats so ever!

No, it's because these dodos had Obama at only +2 in Pennsylvania and Nelson at only +1 in Florida.
Logged
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
a Person
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,735
Antarctica


WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2012, 03:12:34 PM »

We can talk when they spell the name Kaine correctly! What a joke

Wow...

Bet PPP or survey USA would have Obama up 6 there at the moment. Makes no sense, and Gravis has no proven track record to deserve any benefit of doubt.

The typical forum response to anything that doesn't show the Democrats leading...oh it must not have any accuracy whats so ever!

Keep trying to troll yourself out of this... Roll Eyes

Hypocrisy is a word you should look up, mondale84.
Logged
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
a Person
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,735
Antarctica


WWW
« Reply #2 on: September 11, 2012, 03:24:06 PM »

We can talk when they spell the name Kaine correctly! What a joke

Wow...

Bet PPP or survey USA would have Obama up 6 there at the moment. Makes no sense, and Gravis has no proven track record to deserve any benefit of doubt.

The typical forum response to anything that doesn't show the Democrats leading...oh it must not have any accuracy whats so ever!

Keep trying to troll yourself out of this... Roll Eyes

Hypocrisy is a word you should look up, mondale84.

I'm not the one defending an obvious junk poll...

Since you apparently didn't look up hypocrisy...
Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

You were implying that you had a virtue (in this case, not being a troll) that you obviously do not.
[Evidence below]


Be disgusted at the massive amount of voter fraud the Republicans will have perpetrated in order to get that close to 50% of the vote. No way that Romney beats Obama by that much in the PV without massive fraud, NO WAY.
Logged
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
a Person
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,735
Antarctica


WWW
« Reply #3 on: September 12, 2012, 06:06:56 AM »

We can talk when they spell the name Kaine correctly! What a joke

Wow...

Bet PPP or survey USA would have Obama up 6 there at the moment. Makes no sense, and Gravis has no proven track record to deserve any benefit of doubt.

The typical forum response to anything that doesn't show the Democrats leading...oh it must not have any accuracy whats so ever!

Keep trying to troll yourself out of this... Roll Eyes

Hypocrisy is a word you should look up, mondale84.

I'm not the one defending an obvious junk poll...

Since you apparently didn't look up hypocrisy...
Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

You were implying that you had a virtue (in this case, not being a troll) that you obviously do not.
[Evidence below]


Be disgusted at the massive amount of voter fraud the Republicans will have perpetrated in order to get that close to 50% of the vote. No way that Romney beats Obama by that much in the PV without massive fraud, NO WAY.

How is that trolling?

Gee, let me count the ways... Roll Eyes


Let me stop you right there. RCP are not right-wing hacks, and the feature you are talking about is a poll aggregator.


45.4. To Obama's 49%. That's about half the margin of 2008.

and Obamamentum only continues to grow.

Since 3Sep, yes. So nine days.
In comparison, Romney was steadily increasing his percentage, with few hiccups, from 12Aug to 5Sep. These trends can change.

There is no way that Romney comes close to winning the PV

Even though he was tied less than two weeks ago.
Remember four years ago, mondale84? You know, when McCain was actually ahead for a while, but then Lehman collapsed and everything changed? A similar event, which could quite possibly happen before November, would decimate Obama's chances.

and no way he wins by Virginia - let alone is leading by 5 right now.

Nobody sane said so.

Stop defending the right-wing trolls on this forum (they are numerous enough to take care of themselves) and move along.

I'm not defending them, I'm saying you are the exact same thing painted a different colour.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 14 queries.