Rank reasons for R Senate Hold and general D disappointment despite winning POTUS (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 06:01:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Rank reasons for R Senate Hold and general D disappointment despite winning POTUS (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Rank reasons for R Senate Hold and general D disappointment despite winning POTUS  (Read 449 times)
Battista Minola 1616
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,491
Vatican City State


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -1.57
« on: November 11, 2020, 06:39:32 AM »
1. Cal Not-so-cunning Ham and his scandal
2. Susan Collins's YUGE personal vote

(3. if you want a margin of error, Biden/Perdue and Biden/Hazel Moderate Heroes™)

Everything else is irrelevant. Flip those and you have a Democratic trifecta.
Logged
Battista Minola 1616
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,491
Vatican City State


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -1.57
« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2020, 12:00:47 PM »
Quote from: Catalyst138 on November 11, 2020, 11:56:38 AM
Quote from: Rum, Romanism, and Rebellion on November 11, 2020, 06:39:32 AM
1. Cal Not-so-cunning Ham and his scandal
2. Susan Collins's YUGE personal vote

(3. if you want a margin of error, Biden/Perdue and Biden/Hazel Moderate Heroes™)

Everything else is irrelevant. Flip those and you have a Democratic trifecta.

Did the scandal really make the difference? Because Biden also lost the state, so it wasn’t just a matter of Cunningham underperforming Biden.

Well 1. can be substituted with whatever reason you want to attribute Cunningham's loss to.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 11 queries.