Ruth Bader Ginsburg hospitalized for possible infection (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 03:44:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Ruth Bader Ginsburg hospitalized for possible infection (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Ruth Bader Ginsburg hospitalized for possible infection  (Read 2741 times)
WD
Western Democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,599
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -0.35

« on: July 17, 2020, 11:29:53 AM »

Ginsburg didnt retire in 2014, when Obama had the Senate, due to the fact, she expected Hilary to be elected as Prez. That's what Bill Clinton told Ginsburg

She miscalculated . Also, she expected Kennedy to retire and it would have been 6 to 3 Liberal than reversed


90-95% of problems Dems have had over the past 30 years can be directly attributed to Bill and Hillary Clinton. They are such a massive metastatic cancer.

You can't say that, the Clintons saved the Democratic Party in the 1990s from electoral irrelevance, Harkin or Tsongas couldn't have beaten Bush.

Explain.

Democrats weren't electorally irrelevant until 1994.
What? How?
Logged
WD
Western Democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,599
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -0.35

« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2020, 01:14:48 PM »

Ginsburg didnt retire in 2014, when Obama had the Senate, due to the fact, she expected Hilary to be elected as Prez. That's what Bill Clinton told Ginsburg

She miscalculated . Also, she expected Kennedy to retire and it would have been 6 to 3 Liberal than reversed


90-95% of problems Dems have had over the past 30 years can be directly attributed to Bill and Hillary Clinton. They are such a massive metastatic cancer.

LOL

Single dumbest thing I’ve ever read on this site, which is really saying something.

Bill Clinton saved the Democratic Party. Three elections in a row, Dems not only lost but were slaughtered in landslides. The party was on the verge of oblivion at the presidential level. Bill broke through and won, won big, and became a great and popular president in his own right. How the hell could he have possibly predicted a Supreme Court justice he nominated would get cancer and not retire early enough decades later, under the first black president but before Donald Trump became president? The things people blame the Clintons for are ridiculous. It’s like “Thanks, Obama” times 1000.

Only on the presidential level. On the congressional level Democrats were destroyed and since his presidency we have only held the house for 5 years, (2007-2011,2019-)
Logged
WD
Western Democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,599
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -0.35

« Reply #2 on: July 17, 2020, 05:30:39 PM »

Ginsburg didnt retire in 2014, when Obama had the Senate, due to the fact, she expected Hilary to be elected as Prez. That's what Bill Clinton told Ginsburg

She miscalculated . Also, she expected Kennedy to retire and it would have been 6 to 3 Liberal than reversed


90-95% of problems Dems have had over the past 30 years can be directly attributed to Bill and Hillary Clinton. They are such a massive metastatic cancer.

LOL

Single dumbest thing I’ve ever read on this site, which is really saying something.

Bill Clinton saved the Democratic Party. Three elections in a row, Dems not only lost but were slaughtered in landslides. The party was on the verge of oblivion at the presidential level. Bill broke through and won, won big, and became a great and popular president in his own right. How the hell could he have possibly predicted a Supreme Court justice he nominated would get cancer and not retire early enough decades later, under the first black president but before Donald Trump became president? The things people blame the Clintons for are ridiculous. It’s like “Thanks, Obama” times 1000.

Only on the presidential level. On the congressional level Democrats were destroyed and since his presidency we have only held the house for 5 years, (2007-2011,2019-)
It's not even worth arguing with this guy. He frequently posts at r/neoliberal....

He probably supports open borders and thinks Bill Clinton was a good guy.

I mean Clinton was a great President, but my point still stands, he didn’t exactly “save” the Democratic Party.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 9 queries.