Underrated consequence of gerrymandering; weakening bench of opposition party? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 10:19:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Underrated consequence of gerrymandering; weakening bench of opposition party? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Underrated consequence of gerrymandering; weakening bench of opposition party?  (Read 1349 times)
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,934


« on: March 12, 2024, 11:35:29 PM »

Oftentimes, congressional reps and state legislators are the main pool from where potential statewide candidates are drawn from, especially folks who may have won hard races.

However, a heavily gerrymandered state means not only will the minority party likely have fewer reps, but they have little ability to actually elect people who have proven they can win hard/competitive seats because those seats don't exist. The minority party's Congressional and State Leg delegations will largely just be made up of politicians representing packs, packs whose politics are out of line with the state at large, and packs where re-election is all but guaranteed once one gets past the primary.

Good example might be TX - the bench for potential statewide Dems is pretty underwhelming, especially if one is just looking at the pool of existing politicians. Most Dems are too liberal and don't have enough experience with competitive general elections to win or even just be competitive statewide. I think this is largely because for the past 2 decades or so, TX Dems have largely been confined to representing urban packs - I wonder if the bench would be stronger if Dems actually had opportunities to compete and win competitive Congressional and State Leg districts. Even today, the one guy running against Cruz for Senate happens to be one of the 2 TX Dems who broke the gerrymander of last decade and won a genuinely competitive seat.

TDLR; Gerrymandering reduces the ability of candidates of the minority party who may be more palatable statewide to be elected to lower-level positions in the first place.

What do ya'll think?
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,934


« Reply #1 on: March 13, 2024, 12:46:28 PM »

100%. This was and still kind of is a big problem for NC Dems.

To be fair the 2022 class gave us Nickel and Jackson, both of whom are potential strong statewide candidates. “Moderate white guy” has always been a winning formula for the NC Dems, as seen by Roy Cooper and Josh Stein. Of course it also gave us Cal Cunningham.

Who got elected on non-gerrymandered maps!

If Dems hadn’t let the court slip away they could have had fair maps for much longer. The hope is that Mark Robinson begins the Arizonification of the NCGOP and that leads to the party’s luck changing on SCOTUS races.

Well, I hope so but I wouldn't bet on it.

Why not?

North Carolina isn’t Arizona. Whereas Arizona is just one massive city with little to no rural population, North Carolina has several medium to large cities but also a large rural population, and is general just much more inelastic

This, plus in AZ Dems can win the state leg just by continuing to flip suburban Pheonix and Tucson seats. In NC, just making gains in suburbs is unlikely to be enough to flip the state leg; Dems have to hold down and claw back in some of these rural areas where they've been losing ground for a while.

For instance, here's the State Senate map; Biden won 19 seats in 2020. Where are the extra 6 or 7 seats coming from that would allow Dems to win? SD-07, SD-18, and maybe SD-34 seem like the only ones with decent long-term trajectories.

Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,934


« Reply #2 on: March 13, 2024, 01:27:48 PM »

100%. This was and still kind of is a big problem for NC Dems.

To be fair the 2022 class gave us Nickel and Jackson, both of whom are potential strong statewide candidates. “Moderate white guy” has always been a winning formula for the NC Dems, as seen by Roy Cooper and Josh Stein. Of course it also gave us Cal Cunningham.

Who got elected on non-gerrymandered maps!

If Dems hadn’t let the court slip away they could have had fair maps for much longer. The hope is that Mark Robinson begins the Arizonification of the NCGOP and that leads to the party’s luck changing on SCOTUS races.

Well, I hope so but I wouldn't bet on it.

Why not?

North Carolina isn’t Arizona. Whereas Arizona is just one massive city with little to no rural population, North Carolina has several medium to large cities but also a large rural population, and is general just much more inelastic

This, plus in AZ Dems can win the state leg just by continuing to flip suburban Pheonix and Tucson seats. In NC, just making gains in suburbs is unlikely to be enough to flip the state leg; Dems have to hold down and claw back in some of these rural areas where they've been losing ground for a while.

For instance, here's the State Senate map; Biden won 19 seats in 2020. Where are the extra 6 or 7 seats coming from that would allow Dems to win? SD-07, SD-18, and maybe SD-34 seem like the only ones with decent long-term trajectories.



NC Dems should focus on statewide races first. If they get the courts back they can get fair maps both for congress and the legislature. Eventually Dems will hit their floor in rural areas and can focus on maximizing their performance in the big cities.

Agree, I think the fear is because the state leg is so powerful they will make more power grabs that make statewide positions including the state court less powerful, or try to do something like electing justices from districts that would prevent liberals from ever having a majority.

Rs have already grabbed the court by changing court elections from non-partisan elections to partisan election where Rs more often than not win.
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,934


« Reply #3 on: March 13, 2024, 02:57:35 PM »

100%. This was and still kind of is a big problem for NC Dems.

To be fair the 2022 class gave us Nickel and Jackson, both of whom are potential strong statewide candidates. “Moderate white guy” has always been a winning formula for the NC Dems, as seen by Roy Cooper and Josh Stein. Of course it also gave us Cal Cunningham.

Who got elected on non-gerrymandered maps!

If Dems hadn’t let the court slip away they could have had fair maps for much longer. The hope is that Mark Robinson begins the Arizonification of the NCGOP and that leads to the party’s luck changing on SCOTUS races.

Well, I hope so but I wouldn't bet on it.

Why not?

North Carolina isn’t Arizona. Whereas Arizona is just one massive city with little to no rural population, North Carolina has several medium to large cities but also a large rural population, and is general just much more inelastic

This, plus in AZ Dems can win the state leg just by continuing to flip suburban Pheonix and Tucson seats. In NC, just making gains in suburbs is unlikely to be enough to flip the state leg; Dems have to hold down and claw back in some of these rural areas where they've been losing ground for a while.

For instance, here's the State Senate map; Biden won 19 seats in 2020. Where are the extra 6 or 7 seats coming from that would allow Dems to win? SD-07, SD-18, and maybe SD-34 seem like the only ones with decent long-term trajectories.



NC Dems should focus on statewide races first. If they get the courts back they can get fair maps both for congress and the legislature. Eventually Dems will hit their floor in rural areas and can focus on maximizing their performance in the big cities.

Agree, I think the fear is because the state leg is so powerful they will make more power grabs that make statewide positions including the state court less powerful, or try to do something like electing justices from districts that would prevent liberals from ever having a majority.

Rs have already grabbed the court by changing court elections from non-partisan elections to partisan election where Rs more often than not win.

They can’t really do those kinds of things if they don’t have a supermajority.

They currently have supermajorities in both chambers, and good chance the gerrymandered maps allow them to retain it in 2024. Rmbr, in NC  a supermajority is only 3/5.

On the State Senate map, Biden only won 19 seats, Dems would need to win 21 seats to break the supermajority. Winning all the Biden seats shouldn't be that hard given the 2 marginal ones have been marching left, but still winning 2 Trump 2020 seats will be tricky. SD-18 is probably part of the path of least resistance.

Biden won 50 seats on the new State House maps (Ds need 49 to break GOP supermajority), but a ton of those Biden seats are marginal and there aren't many narrow Trump seats that are winnable; breaking the supermajority is a decently heavy lift
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 12 queries.