If Jindal clinches it, who could/should be his veep in '12? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 05:30:14 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  If Jindal clinches it, who could/should be his veep in '12? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: If Jindal clinches it, who could/should be his veep in '12?  (Read 3177 times)
paul718
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,012


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: -4.35

« on: October 24, 2008, 04:02:20 PM »
« edited: October 24, 2008, 04:04:31 PM by paul718 »

Someone with foreign policy credentials, since Jindal in '12 = Obama in '08, IMO.   Chuck Hagel would be good if he isn't still sore at the Party, or isn't Obama's SecDef.  Maybe Johnny Isakson?
Logged
paul718
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,012


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: -4.35

« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2008, 09:50:08 PM »

If Jindal wants to have any chance to win in 2012, he needs to choose a moderate VP.

like how the #1 most Liberal senator chose the #3 most Liberal senator as his VP?
Logged
paul718
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,012


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: -4.35

« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2008, 01:08:27 PM »

If Jindal wants to have any chance to win in 2012, he needs to choose a moderate VP.

like how the #1 most Liberal senator chose the #3 most Liberal senator as his VP?

Wasn't he the most liberal according to a conservative website? Wasn't Kerry the most liberal in '04?

I'm so tired of hearing how Obama is the MOST liberal, when there are at least 10 senators more liberal than him. Obama is not the most liberal member of the senate, he never was.

I'm getting those rankings from the National Journal  which I thought to be fairly non-partisan.  Although I could be wrong (I don't read the National Journal).  Regardless, the only time he bucked the liberal elements of his party was on the FISA bill, which I viewed as typical of the "run-to-the-center" general election strategy. 

He is pro-choice, pro-affirmative action (to a degree), pro-union.  He wants to raise the corporate tax, raise the capital gains tax, raise the social security tax, and raise the top marginal rates.  He wants to send a check to the 40% of the population who don't pay any income tax.  He is a protectionist, has talked of pulling out of NAFTA, and is opposed to a free trade agreement with Colombia.  He is pro-embryonic stem-cell research, and pro-gun control.

If he's not the most liberal senator in Congress, how about this... If elected, he would be the most liberal President we've ever had.  Fair?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.