Blue districts in Red Areas (And vice/versu) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 12:27:39 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Blue districts in Red Areas (And vice/versu) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Blue districts in Red Areas (And vice/versu)  (Read 607 times)
Hope For A New Era
EastOfEden
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,719


« on: December 28, 2020, 12:10:46 AM »

Missouri - three D+5 districts and one D+10 district.

https://davesredistricting.org/join/89a6e736-4f12-4367-9ef0-cf0a02e323fd

That's a truly nightmarish shoestring connecting Kansas City, Columbia, Jefferson City, Springfield, and St. Louis (county).

The four D districts are designed for trends, too. This is with 2016 Presidential data. They will only become more D during the 2020s, the northern KC-centered one especially.

Also, the McCloskeys get to be in a Safe R district with this map (lol).

It's possible to make a more geographically balanced map by making two districts linking Kansas City to Columbia and Jefferson City respectively and hugging the river, but then those two districts are only Clinton +1. Trends will change this eventually, though.


Obviously, this ignores the VRA. I'll have to see if it's still possible while following it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 10 queries.