Was Kerry the most electable candidate in '04 after all? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 03:43:53 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Was Kerry the most electable candidate in '04 after all? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Was Kerry the most electable candidate in '04 after all?  (Read 3074 times)
anvi
anvikshiki
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,400
Netherlands


« on: December 27, 2008, 01:46:13 AM »

If Gephardt could have gotten the nomination, I think he would have stood the best chance on the electoral map; he would have taken Kerry's states plus Iowa and Missouri, and that would have brought the electoral count to 269 Gephardt 268 Bush, so Gephardt would have to have pulled in one more state, maybe Nevada or New Mexico, both of which Kerry barely lost.  But, I have to say that, Gephardt having been eliminated, I had wished that Dean would have been nominated.  He may have lost to Bush too, but the election would at least have been about something important, namely the war, and the nation desperately needed that debate at that point.  I'm sorry to say that Kerry was a lame candidate.  He is a very compelling person, no doubt, but he was completely incapable of making any emotional connection to the voters, and if you don't have that, you can't win. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 12 queries.