Would either the Supreme Court or the Attorney General care to express an opinion on whether with vacant governorships the number of governors needed to approve a plan remains the same or does it decrease. i.e, if Governor Seige40 wins the Senate race whether we will the approval of 2/3 of 5 governors which is 4 and thus impossible or the approval of 2/3 of 3 governors and thus possible.
The Supreme Court cannot rule unless it actually has a case, and soon, hopefully, won't be able to rule unless the plaintiff has standing. I'll have a look at it over the next few hours and give you an opinion on the matter myself though.