National Presidential Primary County and State Maps (1912-2020) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 04:53:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  National Presidential Primary County and State Maps (1912-2020) (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10
Author Topic: National Presidential Primary County and State Maps (1912-2020)  (Read 321996 times)
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #125 on: March 07, 2012, 03:11:05 AM »

Updated with Super Tuesday results. I even have the results for North Dakota by LD. Smiley
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #126 on: March 07, 2012, 08:43:53 PM »

2012 map updated with Alaska district results.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #127 on: March 07, 2012, 09:26:33 PM »

2012 Alaska Rep Caucus Statewide Map:



Anchorage Inset:




Fairbanks Inset:




Results Table:

Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #128 on: March 07, 2012, 11:37:40 PM »

If it's not too much work, could you make a 2012 Democratic map?

I've been sort of working on it, but it wasn't very interesting until Oklahoma.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #129 on: March 08, 2012, 12:02:12 AM »

2012 Dem Primaries:



And yes, those are all the counties in Minnesota that caucused.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #130 on: March 11, 2012, 12:35:39 AM »

Here's some more Fuzzy.

Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #131 on: March 11, 2012, 09:24:04 PM »

Per the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, Santorum won the North Pole. Alaska house district initially given to Santorum.  The vote was Santorum 148, Paul 123, Romney 96 and Gingrich 52.

District 2 just swapped the numbers then. It makes sense; it seemed random that Gingrich had won that district. Too bad that's not enough to give Santorum a win. Tongue
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #132 on: March 15, 2012, 10:02:00 PM »

Fairly extensive update on the CD map. FL and AZ released their results by old CD:

Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #133 on: March 19, 2012, 01:07:15 AM »

Hawaii Republican Caucus



Oahu

Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #134 on: March 19, 2012, 01:44:13 AM »

Surprised Santorum won so much of Oahu... I take it the Romney areas have a lot more Republicans?

I can definitely tell where Laie is. Tongue

Romney mostly won because he ran better in the districts he won in than Santorum did in the districts he won in. Turnout was fairly similar, if perhaps slightly higher in Romney areas. The exception, of course, is Laie. Turnout was absolutely massive there. Laie had 2.3 times as many voters as the next highest district, and 92.52% of them went for Romney. Without Laie, Romney would have still won, but by a much smaller margin.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #135 on: May 07, 2012, 08:27:10 PM »

2012 R map updated with Louisiana caucus results.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #136 on: July 24, 2014, 03:30:42 PM »
« Edited: December 17, 2014, 07:47:01 PM by realisticidealist »

What happened to North Dakota in the 1996 Democratic primary?

Clinton wasn't on the ballot. I'm not entirely sure why.

EDIT: I don't think Miles' 2008 NC Dem precinct map has been posted in this thread yet:

Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #137 on: September 01, 2015, 01:41:45 PM »
« Edited: February 17, 2016, 11:59:02 PM by realisticidealist »

2012 Wisconsin R Primary by Ward



Romney won Milwaukee 43.90%-35.14%. (14.04% for Paul).
Santorum won Madison 37.70%-32.37% (19.93% for Paul).
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #138 on: September 23, 2015, 01:02:08 PM »

Where do you get all these state precinct maps from?  Dave's Redistricting?

I generally try to find shapefiles based on the current maps; it's easiest to do it close to the election you want to map.

The shapefiles sometimes need to be edited to fit the results; the Wisconsin ward results merged about 3,000 wards (just under half), so I took a ward shapefile from the WI legislature's website and merged a ton of wards together in ArcGIS.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #139 on: October 07, 2015, 08:04:24 PM »


Easiest way is probably to download a free GIS program, open the shapefile, then print screen it.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #140 on: November 20, 2015, 02:32:57 AM »
« Edited: November 20, 2015, 02:55:20 PM by realisticidealist »

2000 Reform Party Presidential Primaries, AKA Donald Trump's first run for the White House:



Edit: Also updated the 1916 R Primary to include Montana. Teddy Roosevelt managed to win Missoula County as a write-in.

Edit 2: 1964 Florida Rep Primary added
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #141 on: January 05, 2016, 02:26:36 PM »

Added 1912 Nebraska for both parties
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #142 on: February 02, 2016, 02:58:00 PM »
« Edited: February 18, 2016, 12:00:13 AM by realisticidealist »

2016 Iowa Republican caucus by precinct (Trump blue, Cruz yellow, Rubio green, Carson purple, Fiorina red, Santorum orange):

Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #143 on: February 02, 2016, 11:25:25 PM »

2016 Iowa Democratic caucus by precinct

Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #144 on: February 04, 2016, 12:54:21 PM »

Nice work!

Is that an O'Malley precinct in purple in one of the north-central towns? (maybe Algona, eyeballing a comparison to Google maps)

It's listed as Uncommitted winning the one delegate in that precinct, actually. I don't think O'Malley won any precincts.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #145 on: February 10, 2016, 02:47:54 PM »

2016 NH Town Maps (Kasich is red on the rightward map):

Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #146 on: February 11, 2016, 02:21:41 AM »

Comparing vote totals across parties:

Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #147 on: February 16, 2016, 11:47:20 AM »


Using the same color scale, here's Iowa by Senate District:

Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #148 on: February 16, 2016, 01:01:47 PM »
« Edited: February 16, 2016, 01:04:08 PM by realisticidealist »

I made some minor candidate Iowa maps to try and show where each candidate's best and worst areas were. They aren't meant to be compared to each other directly.

Rand Paul:


Jeb Bush:


Carly Fiorina:


John Kasich:


Mike Huckabee:


Chris Christie:


Rick Santorum:
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,821


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #149 on: February 16, 2016, 01:39:08 PM »

Going forward, would you prefer a map like this:



or like this:

Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.069 seconds with 12 queries.