VP option: Would Rubio have been a better option than Paul Ryan? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2024, 03:29:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  VP option: Would Rubio have been a better option than Paul Ryan? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: VP option: Would Rubio have been a better option than Paul Ryan?  (Read 1470 times)
sg0508
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,062
United States


« on: November 09, 2012, 11:02:45 AM »

Don't overestimate the VP choice.  One thing I believe that hasn't changed is that people in general don't vote for VP.  They vote for president.  Gore was a great choice for Clinton in '92, Quayle was a nightmare in '88, but people vote the top of the ticket. 

Could Rubio have made any difference? Possibly.  Also, Romney will never say if he asked someone else before Ryan and they said "no". 

Lastly, it's very rare to lose the campaign as a VP candidate on the ticket and maintain your popularity.  I personally think Paul Ryan will take a hit concerning his image going forward.  He added very little to the overall campaign.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.