Is NJ solidly Democratic yet? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 07:13:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  Is NJ solidly Democratic yet? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Is NJ solidly Democratic yet?  (Read 4512 times)
Brutus
Rookie
**
Posts: 72


« on: February 23, 2004, 02:32:40 AM »

In the Dukakis blowout in 88', the dems lost NJ by 14%. Although this was not a typical election, Dukakis did carry Oregon, West Virginia and the upper-midwest, while losing the mid-atlantic Connecticut and Northern New England. NJ barely chose Clinton over Bush in 92'. I think NJ could be a swing state if the Republicans ran a Northern, or Western candidate who is a social moderate.

One could say, "this isn't your father's Republican party."  The GOP has changed a lot since Republicans like Thomas Dewey, or even Gerald Ford, were strong candidates in the North.  I agree with what seems to be the consensus here - that Bush won't win NJ unless it's a landslide on par with a 1972 or 1984.  In the future, however,  a candidate like Guiliani could make it very competitive.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.